City of Charlotte Banner
File #: 15-18051    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Public Hearing Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/23/2022 In control: City Council Business Meeting
On agenda: 6/13/2022 Final action:
Title: Public Hearing on a Resolution to Close Unopened Beechway Circle and Mark Way Right-of-Way
Attachments: 1. 2021-29A Unopened Beechway Cr and Mark Way Abandonment Map, 2. 2021-29A Resolution to Close 06.13.pdf
Title
Public Hearing on a Resolution to Close Unopened Beechway Circle and Mark Way Right-of-Way

Action
Action:
A. Conduct a public hearing to close unopened Beechway Circle and Mark Way Right-of-Way, and

B. Adopt a resolution and close unopened Beechway Circle and Mark Way Right-of-Way.

Body
Staff Resource(s):
Liz Babson, Transportation
Anthony Mendez, Transportation

Explanation
* NC General Statute Section 160A-299 outlines the procedures for permanently closing streets and alleys.
* The Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT) received a petition to abandon public right-of-way and requests this City Council action in accordance with the statute.
* The action removes land from public right-of-way and attaches it to the adjacent property.
* The attached resolution refers to exhibits and metes and bounds descriptions that are available in the City Clerk's Office.
* The right-of-way to be closed is located in Council District 1.

Petitioner
Sugar Creek Apartments, LLC

Right-of-Way to be Abandoned
Unopened Beechway Circle and Mark Way right-of-way

Reason
Per the petition submitted by Sugar Creek Apartments, LLC, the abandonment of the unopened right-of-way, will allow for future development of the site. The City has no objections.

Notification
As part of the City's notification process, and in compliance with NC General Statute Section 160A-299, the CDOT submitted this abandonment petition for review by the public and City departments.

Adjoining property owner(s)
Sugar Creek Apartments, LLC.- No objections
Mecklenburg County- No objections

City Departments
* Review by City departments identified no apparent reason this closing would:
* Be contrary to the public interest;
* Deprive any individual(s) owning property in the vicinity of reasonable means of ingress and egress to their property as outlined in the statutes; and
* Be contrary to the adopted policy to preserve existing rights-of-way for connectivity.

Attachments
Attachment(s)
M...

Click here for full text