City of Charlotte  
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center  
600 East 4th Street  
Charlotte, NC 28202  
Meeting Agenda  
Monday, August 24, 2026  
Council Chamber  
City Council Business Meeting  
Mayor Robert Harrington  
Mayor Pro Tem James Mitchell  
Council Member Dimple Ajmera  
Council Member Dante Anderson  
Council Member JD Mazuera Arias  
Council Member Ed Driggs  
Council Member Malcolm Graham  
Council Member Renee Johnson  
Council Member LaWana Mayfield  
Council Member Joi Mayo  
Council Member Kimberly Owens  
Council Member Victoria Watlington  
5:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING,  
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG GOVERNMENT CENTER,  
COUNCIL CHAMBER  
This meeting will also be accessible via the Government Channel, the City's Facebook page, and  
the City's YouTube channel.  
Call to Order  
Introductions  
Invocation  
Pledge of Allegiance  
.
1.  
Mayor and Council Consent Item Questions and Answers  
Staff Resource(s):  
Sarah Hazel, City Manager’s Office  
Time: 5 minutes  
Synopsis  
Mayor and Council may ask questions about Consent agenda items.  
.
2.  
Consent agenda items 13 through 32 may be considered in  
one motion except for those items removed by a Council  
member. Items are removed by notifying the City Clerk.  
Time: 10 minutes  
Consideration of Consent Items shall occur in the following order:  
A. Items that have not been pulled,  
B. Items with residents signed up to speak to the item, and  
C. Items that have been pulled for a separate vote.  
PUBLIC FORUM  
3. Public Forum  
PUBLIC HEARING  
4.  
Public Hearing and Decision on a Resolution to Close a  
Portion of Pete Brown Road  
Action:  
A.  
Conduct a public hearing to close a portion of Pete Brown Road, and  
B.  
Adopt a resolution and close a portion of Pete Brown Road.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Leslie Bing, Transportation  
Explanation  
§
NC General Statute Section 160A-299 outlines the procedures for permanently closing streets and  
alleys.  
§
The Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT) received a petition signed by the adjacent  
property owners to abandon public right-of-way and requests this City Council action in accordance  
with the statute.  
§
The action removes land from public right-of-way and attaches it to the adjacent property. The  
land will be distributed proportionally between adjacent property owners in accordance with NC  
General Statute Section 160A-299.  
§
§
The attached resolution refers to exhibits and metes and bounds descriptions that are available in  
the City Clerk’s Office.  
The right-of-way is located in Council District 2.  
Petitioner  
Toll Southeast LP Company Inc.  
Right-of-Way to be Abandoned  
A portion of Pete Brown Road  
Reason  
Per the petition submitted by Toll Southeast LP Company Inc., the abandonment of the unopened  
right-of-way will facilitate future redevelopment of abutting parcels.  
Notification  
As part of the city’s notification process, and in compliance with NC General Statute Section 160A-299,  
CDOT submitted this abandonment petition for review by the public and city departments.  
Adjoining property owner(s)  
Harris Woods, LLC - No objections  
Neighborhood/Business Association(s)  
None  
Private Utility Companies  
No objections  
City Departments  
§
Review by city departments identified no apparent reason this closing would:  
-
-
Be contrary to the public interest;  
Deprive any individual(s) owning property in the vicinity of reasonable means of ingress and  
egress to their property as outlined in the statutes; or  
-
Be contrary to the adopted policy to preserve existing rights-of-way for connectivity.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
5.  
Public Hearing and Decision on a Resolution to Close a  
Portion of Weona Avenue  
Action:  
A.  
Conduct a public hearing to close a portion of Weona Avenue, and  
B.  
Adopt a resolution and close a portion of Weona Avenue.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Leslie Bing, Transportation  
Explanation  
§
NC General Statute Section 160A-299 outlines the procedures for permanently closing streets and  
alleys.  
§
The Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT) received a petition signed by the adjacent  
property owners to abandon public right-of-way and requests this City Council action in accordance  
with the statute.  
§
The action removes land from public right-of-way and attaches it to the adjacent property. The  
land will be distributed proportionally between adjacent property owners in accordance with NC  
General Statute Section 160A-299.  
§
§
The attached resolution refers to exhibits and metes and bounds descriptions that are available in  
the City Clerk’s Office.  
The right-of-way is located in Council District 1.  
Petitioner  
Crosland Greens, LLC  
Right-of-Way to be Abandoned  
A portion of Weona Avenue  
Reason  
Per the petition submitted by Crosland Greens LLC, the abandonment of the opened right-of-way will  
facilitate future redevelopment of abutting parcels.  
Notification  
As part of the city’s notification process, and in compliance with NC General Statute Section 160A-299,  
CDOT submitted this abandonment petition for review by the public and city departments.  
Adjoining property owner(s)  
None  
Neighborhood/Business Association(s)  
None  
Private Utility Companies  
No objections  
City Departments  
§
Review by city departments identified no apparent reason this closing would:  
-
-
Be contrary to the public interest;  
Deprive any individual(s) owning property in the vicinity of reasonable means of ingress and  
egress to their property as outlined in the statutes; or  
-
Be contrary to the adopted policy to preserve existing rights-of-way for connectivity.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
POLICY  
6.  
City Manager’s Report  
.
7.  
Charlotte Streets Map and Charlotte Streets Manual  
Amendments  
Action:  
A.  
B.  
Adopt a resolution approving amendments to the Charlotte Streets Map, and  
Adopt a resolution approving amendments to the Charlotte Streets Manual.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Katie Witherspoon, Transportation  
Jake Carpenter, Transportation  
Explanation  
§
On August 22, 2022, City Council adopted the current Charlotte Streets Map and the Charlotte  
Streets Manual.  
§
The Streets Map and Streets Manual are key technical support documents to the Unified  
Development Ordinance (UDO) that further the goal of creating safe and equitable mobility outlined  
in the Strategic Mobility Plan and the Charlotte Future 2040 Comprehensive Plan.  
The Streets Map is a digital map that shows future multimodal cross-sections for all of Charlotte’s  
arterial streets and the location of all collector streets. The map also provides key information about  
streetscape and curb lines referenced in the UDO.  
§
§
-
Changes to a Street Classification (Street Type) require City Council approval.  
The Streets Manual is a technical document that supports the subdivision, streets, and other  
infrastructure regulations and the UDO. The Streets Manual includes the components below:  
-
-
-
Streets Map supporting document, which provides detailed explanations of the content in  
the digital Streets Map;  
Access Management and Driveway Design, which provides guidance, rules, and processes for  
developers and property owners seeking access to public streets; and  
Comprehensive Transportation Review Guidelines, which include Traffic Impact Study  
guidance to provide a multimodal review of transportation-related impacts from development  
and outlines mitigations.  
§
On August 10, 2026, public comment on the final draft of the amended Streets Map and amended  
Streets Manual was held.  
Proposed Changes  
§
The proposed amendment to the Streets Map reclassifies Woody Point Road from a collector street  
to a local street.  
§
The proposed amendments to the Streets Manual include:  
-
-
Additional guidance related to Fee In Lieu provisions for Tier 3 parking reduction requests  
and parking demand management assessments; and  
Amendments that are primarily administrative in nature and are intended to provide enhanced  
clarity and further alignment with corresponding UDO requirements, including:  
§
§
§
Updated zoning district references and additional minor clarifications,  
Updated language guiding multimodal assessment mitigation options, and  
Clarifying revisions to the language guiding Streets Map amendments.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
Summary of Street Manual Amendments  
8.  
Parking on Sidewalk Ordinance Amendment  
Action:  
Adopt an ordinance approving an amendment to Chapter 14, Article IV, Section 14-130 of the City  
Code as recommended by the Budget, Governance, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee.  
Council Resource(s):  
Malcolm Graham, Budget, Governance, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee  
Staff Resource(s):  
Andrea Leslie-Fite, City Attorney  
Lisa Flowers, City Attorney’s Office  
Current Ordinance  
§
The city’s ordinances regarding motor vehicles and traffic are codified in Chapter 14. Two provisions  
of Chapter 14 address the prohibition of parking on sidewalks:  
-
Section 14-216(a)(9) provides that it is unlawful “to stop, stand, or park a vehicle … [o]n a  
sidewalk.”  
-
Section 14-130 provides that it is “unlawful to operate, drive, stop, stand, or park a vehicle  
upon any sidewalk or sidewalk area except at a permanent or temporary driveway.”  
§
Although both sections prohibit parking on sidewalks, Section 14-130 introduces an exception that  
does not appear in Section 14-216(a)(9). The overlapping but different language in these two  
sections creates ambiguity for enforcement officers and residents.  
Proposed Changes  
Amending Section 14-130 to remove the driveway exception will:  
§
-
-
-
Bring Section 14-130 into full alignment with Section 14-216(a)(9);  
Clarify that parking on sidewalks is prohibited under all circumstances; and  
Preserve the city’s ability to enforce sidewalk protections uniformly.  
Committee Discussion  
§
At the August 3, 2026, Budget, Governance, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee meeting,  
the Committee reviewed current ordinance language and needed revisions. The Committee voted  
unanimously (Graham, Mayo, Owens) to recommend the proposed ordinance amendment to Chapter  
14, Article IV, Section 14-130 of the City Code.  
§
Council received an overview of the proposed ordinance amendment at the August 10, 2026, City  
Council Meeting.  
Attachment(s)  
Ordinance  
Ordinance Revisions (red-lined)  
BUSINESS  
9. Youth Diversion Program Interlocal Agreement  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and execute a  
revenue interlocal agreement with Mecklenburg County through which the city will receive funding  
to support youth diversion programming.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Raquishela Stewart, Housing and Neighborhood Services  
Explanation  
§
The NC General Assembly charges counties with establishing Juvenile Crime Prevention Councils  
(JCPC) to plan, organize, and evaluate local programs designed to help prevent or mitigate youth  
involvement in the justice system. These programs focus on prevention, intervention, treatment,  
and aftercare strategies and programs to support youth, strengthen families, and promote  
community safety.  
§
§
Each year, the Mecklenburg County JCPC receives funds for this purpose from the state of North  
Carolina. The JCPC partners with local agencies through a Request for Proposals process to provide  
youth services utilizing these state funds.  
On April 1, 2026, the JCPC proposed allocating $238,957 of their state funds to support the city’s  
Office of Youth Opportunities Fiscal Year 2027 Youth Diversion Program (Program), marking the  
fifteenth year of the city’s partnership with Mecklenburg County to provide these services. The  
JCPC allocation was approved by the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners on April 21, 2026.  
Diversion provides an alternative to arrest for young people while maintaining accountability for  
unlawful actions and supporting efforts to redirect behavior.  
§
-
Youth who have committed first-time, minor offenses are referred to the Program by school  
resource officers, patrol officers, and court counselors from the NC Department of Juvenile  
Justice.  
-
After successful completion of the Program, charges are dismissed.  
§
Program services include interpersonal skill building, conflict resolution, substance awareness,  
academic coaching, and career development plan workshops. Parental skills training is provided to  
the parents/guardians of Program participants.  
§
§
After completing the Program, the assigned school resource officer provides ongoing, weekly  
check-ins with Program participants to reinforce key lessons and ensure continued progress.  
Grant funding supports delivery of the Program to approximately 315 youth annually. To date, the  
Program has served more than 5,300 youth, over 90 percent of whom did not recidivate within 12  
months after program completion.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Grants Fund  
Attachment(s)  
Resolution  
Draft Interlocal Agreement  
APPOINTMENTS  
10. Appointments to the Community Relations Committee  
Action:  
Appoint residents to serve as specified.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Stephanie Kelly, City Clerk  
Explanation  
§
Two appointments for a partial term beginning upon appointment and ending June 30, 2028.  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Terry Carmichael II, nominated by Council members Mazuera Arias and Owens.  
Zachary Claywell, nominated by Council members Ajmera, Johnson, Mayo, and Owens.  
LeShandra Davis, nominated by Council members Ajmera, Graham, Johnson, and Mayo.  
Malen Destinasse, nominated by Council members Graham and Mayfield.  
Alexis Hilling, nominated by Council members Driggs and Owens.  
Cedric McCorkle, nominated by Council members Mayfield and Mitchell.  
Attachment(s)  
Community Relations Committee Applications  
11. Mayor and Council Topics  
.
12. Closed Session  
CONSENT  
13. Alarm Registration and Management Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve contract extension #2 for a term of one year to the contract with Central  
Technologies LLC, dba Superion, LLC for false alarm registration and management services,  
and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract and this extension were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Chief Estella Patterson, Police  
Kellie High-Foster, Police  
Explanation  
§
City Council adopted a False Alarm Ordinance, effective May 1996, to establish reasonable  
expectations of alarm users ensuring that they are held responsible for the use of their alarm  
systems.  
§
On July 13, 2020, City Council approved a contract with Central Square Technologies, LLC dba  
Superion, LLC for alarm registration and management services for a term of three years with two,  
one-year renewals.  
§
§
On August 11, 2025, City Council approved a contract extension with Central Square Technologies,  
LLC dba Superion, LLC for one additional year.  
Superion, LLC ensures compliance with all registration and permit requirements outlined in the  
ordinance and collects fines for excessive false alarms. The company provides around-the-clock  
system maintenance, compliance monitoring, and administrative services.  
Waiver of a competitive solicitation process for services may be granted on a limited basis when  
deemed appropriate and in the city’s best interest. A waiver has been approved for these services  
based on continuity of service.  
§
§
§
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $575,000.  
The new estimated value of the contract including extension #2 is $3,828,290.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use minority-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new  
law, no MBE/WBE/MWBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts. SBE goals are  
not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program.  
Small Business Participation  
A waiver of solicitation was necessary for this contract due to need for continuity of existing services.  
Contracts with a waiver of solicitation do not involve a competitive bidding process and are exempt from  
the CBI program.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Police Operating Budget  
14. U.S. Department of Justice FY 2025 Edward Byrne Memorial  
Justice Assistance Grant  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into a memorandum of understanding  
with Mecklenburg County as a law enforcement partner through the Edward Byrne Memorial  
Justice Assistance Grant from the U.S. Department of Justice.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Chief Estella Patterson, Police  
Jacquelyn Bryley, Police  
Morgan Parks, Police  
Explanation  
§
§
Each year, the city applies for and receives the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant.  
The grant will fund overtime for neighborhood patrols and crime lab staff, the Police Cadet Program,  
and the Summer Intern Program.  
§
The grant requires that Mecklenburg County receive a portion of the total award as a law  
enforcement partner.  
§
§
The city’s share of the funding will be $495,168, and Mecklenburg County will receive $123,800.  
No matching contribution from the city is required.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Grants Fund  
Attachment(s)  
Resolution  
Memorandum of Understanding  
15. Construction Engineering Inspection, Utility Coordination,  
and Utility Relocation Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve unit price contracts for construction engineering inspection, utility coordination,  
and utility relocation services for a term of three years with the following:  
-
-
-
-
Colliers Engineering,  
RK&K,  
STV,  
Volkert, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for up to one, two-year term with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for  
which the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Kathleen Cishek, Transportation  
Tonia Wimberly, Transportation  
Explanation  
§
These contracts ensure mobility infrastructure is constructed to city standards, protecting public  
investments while advancing a safe, connected, equitable, sustainable, prosperous, and innovative  
transportation network for Charlotte.  
§
These task order contracts will be used by staff to provide construction engineering inspection,  
utility coordination, and utility relocation services for various mobility infrastructure projects to  
supplement our existing staff to meet the increased capital delivery demands.  
On May 6, 2026, the city issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ); 10 responses were received.  
The companies selected best meet the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFQ requirements.  
§
§
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $6,000,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because the scope of work required does not present  
viable subcontracting opportunities. The selected companies will be responsible for 100% of the work, and  
there are no opportunities to include subcontractors. This assessment was confirmed by CBI and the  
respective departments after reviewing the project’s scope and potential for division into subcontracting  
opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Capital Investment Plan  
16. Pavement Marking Materials  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a unit price contract with the lowest responsive, responsible bidder Crown USA,  
Inc. for the purchase of pavement marking materials for a term of three years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to one, two-year term with possible  
price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Bryan Tarlton, Transportation  
Explanation  
§
The Charlotte Department of Transportation operates and maintains a transportation network that  
contains over 5,000 lane miles.  
§
Pavement markings are critical in regulating traffic movement for motorists, cyclists, and  
pedestrians.  
§
§
§
On May 15, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; five bids were received.  
Crown USA, Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
§
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $200,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
Small Business contract goals were not established for this contract because there were limited certified SBEs  
available within the city’s database capable of performing the required work or providing the necessary goods.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Transportation Operating Budget  
17. Hydro-Excavation Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve unit price contracts for hydro-excavation services for a term of three years with  
the following:  
-
-
Cuevac, LLC,  
NG Companies, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for  
which the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Shawn Coffman, Charlotte Water  
Marion Sanders, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
The Charlotte Water Field Operations Division performs many duties to maintain its network of water  
and wastewater pipelines. Maintaining these pipelines requires hydro-excavation to expose buried  
utilities and structures.  
§
These contracts will provide hydro-excavation services on an as-needed basis throughout the  
Charlotte Water service area.  
§
§
On June 25, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); three responses were received.  
The selected companies best meet the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $250,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because the scope of work or goods does not  
present viable subcontracting opportunities. The selected companies will be responsible 100% of the work  
or goods, and there are no opportunities to include subcontractors. This assessment was confirmed by CBI  
and the respective department after reviewing the project’s scope and potential for division into  
subcontracting opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Operating Budget  
18. McAlpine Creek 54-inch Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation  
Project Phase 2 Change Order  
Action:  
Approve change order #1 for $1,797,204 to the contract with Insituform Technologies, LLC for the  
McAlpine Creek 54-inch Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Phase 2.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Shawn Coffman, Charlotte Water  
Marion Sanders, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This project involves rehabilitating 6,075 linear feet of 54-inch sanitary sewer located along  
McAlpine Creek and the associated manholes in Council District 7.  
§
On November 10, 2025, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a  
contract with Insituform Technologies, LLC for $5,854,732.73 for the McAlpine Creek 54-inch  
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project Phase 2.  
§
§
Change order #1 is needed to extend pipe rehabilitation by an additional 1,676 linear feet. The  
additional work will allow the project to use an existing access point, reducing future restoration  
costs and avoiding the need to establish a new access point later.  
The new total value of the contract including change order #1 is $7,651,936.73.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments to  
use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts. SBE  
goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable law.  
Small Business Participation  
All additional work involved in this change order will be performed by the Insituform Technologies, LLC and  
their existing subcontractors.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
19. McAlpine Creek Preliminary and Primary Treatment Facility  
Rehabilitation  
Action:  
Approve a guaranteed maximum price of $39,892,315 with Garney Companies, Inc. for  
design-build construction services for the McAlpine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary  
and Primary Treatment Facilities Rehabilitation project.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This project will provide design and construction services for the rehabilitation of treatment facilities  
for the McAlpine Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), located in the Town of Pineville  
(adjacent to Council District 7).  
§
§
The treatment facilities are critical components of the wastewater treatment process, and the  
project will ensure their continued safe and reliable operation.  
Design-build projects consist of two phases. The design phase delivers the project design, and the  
construction phase will provide one or more guaranteed maximum price (GMP) to finalize the design  
and construct the project.  
§
On August 25, 2025, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a contract  
for $2,289,927 with Garney Companies, Inc. for Design-Build design services for the McAlpine Creek  
Wastewater Treatment Plant Preliminary and Primary Treatment Facilities Rehabilitation project.  
Based on the design, Garney Companies, Inc. developed the first GMP for construction services for  
the project.  
§
§
§
The city’s design-build delivery method is in conformance with NC General Statute Section 143-  
128.1(a) and consistent with the Design-Build Institute of America best practices.  
Including design and construction costs, the total design-build contract value for this project is  
$42,182,242.  
The project is anticipated to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2031.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments to  
use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts. SBE  
goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable law.  
Small Business Participation  
The city negotiates contract participation for Design-Build contracts after the scopes of work for construction  
services are defined. Garney Companies, Inc. has committed $37,500 or 0.09% of the total contract for  
construction services the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
§
Charlotte Bolt & Foundation Systems LLC (SBE) ($15,000) (material supplier)  
Redstone Materials Inc. (SBE) ($5,000) (hauling aggregate)  
The Survey Company (SBE) ($17,500) (surveying/engineering)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
20. Nutrient Harvesting at McAlpine Creek Water Resource  
Recovery Facility  
Action:  
Approve a guaranteed maximum price of $3,200,000 with MEB General Contractors, Inc. for  
design-build construction services for the Nutrient Harvesting Facility at the McAlpine Creek Water  
Resource Recovery Facility Project.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
The Nutrient Harvesting Project will enhance existing treatment processes at the McAlpine Creek  
Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF), in the Town of Pineville (adjacent to Council District 7),  
by recovering phosphorus from the wastewater treatment process.  
§
§
This project supports the city’s Strategic Energy Action Plan goals by helping to create a circular  
economy.  
Design-build projects consist of two phases. The design phase delivers the project design, and the  
construction phase will provide one or more guaranteed maximum price (GMP) to finalize the design  
and construct the project.  
§
On October 11, 2021, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a contract  
for $2,098,500 with MEB General Contractors, Inc. for Design-Build design services for the Nutrient  
Harvesting Facility at the McAlpine Creek WRRF Project. Based on the design, MEB General  
Contractors, Inc. developed a GMP for construction services for the project.  
The city’s design-build delivery method is in conformance with NC General Statute Section 143-  
128.1(a) and consistent with the Design-Build Institute of America best practices.  
Including design and construction costs, the total design-build contract value for this project is  
$47,326,421.  
§
§
§
The project is anticipated to be completed by the third quarter of 2027.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments to  
use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts. SBE  
goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable law.  
Small Business Participation  
The city negotiates contract participation for Design-Build contracts after the scopes of work for construction  
services are defined. All additional work involved in this Guaranteed Maximum Prime will be performed by MEB  
General Contractors, Inc. and their existing subcontractors.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
21. Professional Engineering Services for Various Storm Water  
Services Projects  
Action:  
A.  
Approve unit price contracts for professional engineering services for a term of three years  
with the following:  
-
-
-
Ardurra Group North Carolina,  
ESP Associates, Inc.,  
LandDesign, Inc., and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for  
which the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Matthew Gustis, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
These contracts will provide engineering analysis and design services for projects ranging from  
single property repairs to area-based drainage solutions.  
§
§
On June 4, 2026, the city issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ); 11 responses were received.  
The selected companies are the best qualified firms to meet the city’s needs on the basis of  
demonstrated competence and qualification of professional services in response to the RFQ  
requirements.  
§
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $1,500,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
The city negotiates project participation after the proposal selection process. Each Prime has identified the  
following certified firm(s) to be utilized:  
Ardurra Group North Carolina  
§
Tidemark Land Services (SBE) (topographic surveys and plat services)  
ESP Associates, Inc.  
§
§
§
Barry Lambert Engineering (SBE) (structural engineering)  
Centerline Locating LLC (SBE) (utility locating, SUE, and CCTV services)  
The Survey Company Inc. (SBE) (land surveying)  
LandDesign, Inc.  
§
§
Barry Lambert Engineering (SBE) (structural engineer)  
Tidemark Land Services (SBE) (land surveyor)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Capital Investment Plan  
22. Utility Billing, Payments, and Related Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract with KUBRA Data Transfer Ltd., A REPAY Company, providing and  
implement utility billing, payment, and related services for a term of two years,  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved, and  
C.  
Authorize the City Manager to approve additional purchases as needed from time to time to  
optimize utility billing, payment, and related services.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Matthew Hastedt, Finance  
Susan Walker, Finance  
Explanation  
§
Finance is responsible for managing utility billing, payment and related offerings for water, sewer,  
and storm water services that include bill processing, printing, mail insertion, postage, archival/bill  
viewing, electronic bill distribution, collection of customer payments, backup facilities, and seamless  
integration with the city’s current web portal provider.  
§
§
§
§
On July 24, 2017, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a contract with  
KUBRA Data Transfer Ltd., A REPAY Company, for utility billing, payment, and related services for a  
term of five years with four, one-year renewal options.  
The continued use of the KUBRA Data Transfer Ltd. system will allow for existing services to  
continue while the Finance department collaborates with Procurement to determine and review  
competitive solicitation options prior to expiration of the contract term.  
Waiver of a competitive solicitation process for services may be granted on a limited basis when  
deemed appropriate and in the city’s best interest. A waiver has been approved for these services  
based on the need for continuity of service and time constraints.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $3,567,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
A waiver of solicitation was necessary for this contract based on the need for continuity of service and  
time constraints. Contracts with a waiver of solicitation do not involve a competitive bidding process and  
are exempt from the CBI program.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Finance Operating Budget  
23. I&T Research, Advisory, and Consulting Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve the purchase of information technology-related research, advisory, and consulting  
services from a cooperative contract,  
B.  
Approve a contract with Gartner, Inc. for the purchase of information technology-related  
research, advisory, and consulting services for a term of three years under National  
Association of State Procurement Officials Master Agreement #DPC-1428523190-SA-21  
-PASS_ITRAC, and  
C.  
Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract for additional terms as long as the  
cooperative contract is in effect at prices and terms that are the same or more favorable  
than those offered under the cooperative contact.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Markell Storay, Innovation and Technology  
Randy Moulton, Innovation and Technology  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
This contract will provide the Innovation and Technology (I&T) department with trusted research,  
industry benchmarks, expert advisory support, and insights into emerging technologies and market  
trends, assisting I&T in making informed strategic investment decisions.  
§
Services may include access to research reports, analyst consultations, vendor evaluation tools,  
benchmarking tools, conferences, and guidance on technology strategy, governance, cybersecurity,  
infrastructure, and digital transformation.  
§
§
NC General Statute Section 143-129(e)(3) allows local governments to purchase from formally  
organized cooperative purchasing contracts.  
A cooperative purchasing agreement results from the consolidation and competitive solicitation of  
multiple public agency requirements. By aggregating common needs all agencies are able to leverage  
economies of scale, such as volume discounts, improved terms and conditions, reduced  
administrative costs, and access to professional and technical expertise.  
§
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $350,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets  
24. Software and Technology Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve the purchase of software and technology services from a cooperative purchasing  
contract,  
B.  
Approve a contract with Carahsoft Technology Corporation for the purchase of software and  
technology services under General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule  
Contract #47QSWA18D008F,  
C.  
D.  
Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract for additional terms as long as the  
cooperative contract remains in effect, at prices and terms that are the same or more  
favorable than those offered under the cooperative contract, and  
Authorize the City Manager to purchase maintenance and support for as long as the city  
uses the products and services.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
John Long, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
Carahsoft Technology Corporation is an authorized reseller of software, cloud services,  
maintenance, support, professional services, and related technology solutions from numerous  
manufacturers.  
§
§
§
This contract will provide a streamlined purchasing vehicle for software subscriptions, renewals,  
maintenance, cloud services, and professional services used across city departments.  
NC General Statute Section 143-129(e)(3) allows local governments to purchase from formally  
organized cooperative purchasing contracts.  
A cooperative purchasing agreement results from the consolidation and competitive solicitation of  
multiple public agency requirements. By aggregating common needs all agencies are able to leverage  
economies of scale, such as volume discounts, improved terms and conditions, reduced  
administrative costs, and access to professional and technical expertise.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $800,000.  
§
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets  
25. Staffing Augmentation and Recruiting Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve contracts for staffing augmentation and recruiting services for a term of three  
years with the following:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22nd Century Technologies, Inc.,  
AppleOne, Inc.,  
Apptad, Inc.,  
ATHENA Consulting LLC,  
BAYINFOTECH LLC,  
Beatty's Services, Inc.,  
Buzzclan, LLC,  
Capital Consulting LLC dba Tharseo IT,  
Core Recruitment LLC,  
Cynet Systems Inc.,  
DatamanUSA, LLC  
Info Labs Inc.,  
Infojini, Inc.,  
InstantServe, LLC,  
iQuasar, LLC,  
JW Affinity IT,  
LanceSoft, Inc.,  
ManpowerGroup US, Inc.,  
Midtown Personnel, Inc.,  
Rose International,  
WinMax Systems Corporation,  
Zencon Group Inc., and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for  
which the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
John Long, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
The use of staffing firms enables the city to:  
-
Augment existing workforce capacity on an as-needed basis to address planned workloads,  
unforeseen demands, special projects, and emerging operational needs;  
Provide temporary personnel to support departments during extended employee absences;  
Access candidates with specialized expertise, knowledge, and skill sets not available within  
the current workforce; and  
-
-
-
Evaluate potential candidates for future city employment opportunities through temporary  
assignments.  
§
§
§
§
Multiple contract awards are recommended to ensure flexibility, provide alternative options, and  
better meet the diverse needs of city departments and operations.  
On July 21, 2025, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) in partnership with Omnia Partners;  
288 responses were received.  
The companies selected best meet the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
Charlotte Cooperative Purchasing Alliance (CCPA) contracts are designed to benefit all entities  
required to comply with state purchasing laws, including cities, counties, public and private schools,  
colleges and universities, non-profits, and governmental entities by leveraging aggregate purchasing  
volume to secure better pricing.  
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
§
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $4,000,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments  
to use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts.  
SBE goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable  
law.  
Small Business Participation  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets  
26. Vehicle and Equipment Welding Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract with Bondo Innovations, LLC for vehicle and equipment welding services  
for a term of two years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to two, two-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
John Long, Contracting and Procurement  
Phil Reiger, General Services  
Explanation  
§
This contract will provide welding, fabrication, repair, and maintenance services for a wide range of  
city vehicles and equipment, including fleet vehicles, heavy equipment, fire apparatus, solid waste  
trucks, airport equipment, street maintenance equipment, and other public works and transportation  
assets.  
§
§
On June 23, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); one response was received.  
Bondo Innovations, LLC best meets the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $600,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Effective July 1, 2026, Session Law 2026-41 eliminated the authority of North Carolina local governments to  
use race-conscious and gender-conscious contracting requirements. In compliance with the new law, no  
MBE/WBE/MWBE/MSBE/WSBE/MWSBE goals or compliance requirements will be included in city contracts. SBE  
goals are not affected and shall continue to be used in compliance with the CBI program and applicable law.  
Small Business Participation  
The city negotiates small business contract participation after the proposal selection process.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets  
27. Meeting Minutes  
Action:  
Approve the titles, motions, and votes reflected in the Clerk’s record as the minutes of:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
May 18, 2026, Budget Adjustment Meeting,  
May 18, 2026, Zoning Meeting,  
May 26, 2026, Business Meeting,  
June 1, 2026, Budget Straw Votes Meeting,  
June 8, 2026, Business Meeting,  
June 15, 2026, Special Meeting,  
June 15, 2026, Zoning Meeting,  
June 18, 2026, Special Meeting, and  
June 22, 2026, Business Meeting.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Stephanie Kelly, City Clerk  
Billie Tynes, Deputy City Clerk  
Explanation  
§
Meeting Minutes can be viewed using the link below:  
Attachment(s)  
Meeting Minutes  
28. Set a Public Hearing on the Freedom Manor at Reedy Creek  
Voluntary Annexation  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution setting a public hearing for September 28, 2026, for the Freedom Manor at  
Reedy Creek voluntary annexation petition.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Monica Holmes Planning, Design, and Development  
Holly Cramer Planning, Design, and Development  
Emma Knauerhase Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
The city has received a petition for voluntary annexation of private property.  
Public hearings are required prior to City Council action on annexation requests.  
This property is located within Charlotte’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.  
The area proposed for annexation shares a small boundary with current city limits via contiguity  
established across Interstate 485.  
§
§
Annexation of this area will allow for extension of city services to a site planned for redevelopment  
by Habitat for Humanity of the Charlotte Region.  
The 12.1417-acre “Freedom Manor at Reedy Creek” site is located along the northwest side of Plaza  
Road and directly east of Interstate 485 in northeastern Mecklenburg County.  
-
The property is currently occupied with one residential structure which will be demolished  
prior to redevelopment.  
-
The property is zoned N1-A (Neighborhood 1-A), which allows for single-family, duplexes,  
triplexes, and a limited number of other uses.  
-
-
-
The petitioner has plans to redevelop the site with 37 single-family detached dwellings.  
The property is located immediately adjacent to Council District 5.  
The petitioned area consists of two parcels: parcel identification numbers 105-211-06 and  
105-211-09.  
Consistency with City Council Policies  
§
The annexation is consistent with city voluntary annexation policy approved by the City Council on  
March 24, 2003; more specifically this annexation:  
-
-
-
Will not adversely affect the city’s ability to undertake future annexations;  
Will not have undue negative impact on city finances or services; and  
Will not result in a situation where unincorporated areas will be encompassed by new city  
limits.  
§
This voluntary annexation is being recommended because the city’s interests will be served by  
annexing the petitioned property.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
29. Set a Public Hearing on the Kings Grant Voluntary  
Annexation  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution setting a public hearing for September 28, 2026, for the Kings Grant voluntary  
annexation petition.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Monica Holmes Planning, Design, and Development  
Holly Cramer Planning, Design, and Development  
Emma Knauerhase Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
The city has received a petition for voluntary annexation of private property.  
Public hearings are required prior to City Council action on annexation requests.  
This property is located within Charlotte’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.  
The area proposed for annexation shares a small boundary with current city limits via contiguity  
established across Interstate 85.  
§
§
Annexation of this area will allow for extension of city services to a site planned for a mix of  
development types.  
The 335.568-acre “Kings Grant” site is located along the Cabarrus County Line, on the northwest  
side of Interstate 85 and the north side of Ridge Road, south of Mallard creek road in northeast  
Mecklenburg County.  
-
-
The property is currently vacant.  
The property is zoned I-1(CD) (Light Industrial, Conditional) and R-22MF(CD) (Muli-Family  
Residential, Conditional).  
§
§
Rezoning petition 2021-028 rezoned the site from CC to I-1(CD) and R-22MF(CD).  
Rezoning petition 2023-028 amended the site plan for the R-22MF(CD) portion of the  
site.  
-
The petitioner has plans to develop 488 multi-family residential dwelling units and up to 2.75  
million square feet of light industrial use. The light industrial uses include approximately  
1,750,000 square feet of warehousing and distribution and approximately 1,000,000 square  
feet of light manufacturing and assembly.  
-
-
The property is located immediately adjacent to Council District 4.  
The petitioned area consists of five parcels: parcel identification numbers 029-581-15, 029-  
181-11, 029-591-05, 029-591-03, and 029-591-06.  
Consistency with City Council Policies  
§
The annexation is consistent with city voluntary annexation policy approved by the City Council on  
March 24, 2003; more specifically this annexation:  
-
-
-
Will not adversely affect the city’s ability to undertake future annexations;  
Will not have undue negative impact on city finances or services; and  
Will not result in a situation where unincorporated areas will be encompassed by new city  
limits.  
§
This voluntary annexation is being recommended because the city’s interests will be served by  
annexing the petitioned property.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
Rezoning Petition 2021-028  
Rezoning Petition 2023-028  
30. Set a Public Hearing on the Taylor Grove at Mallard Creek  
Voluntary Annexation  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution setting a public hearing for September 28, 2026, for the Taylor Grove at Mallard  
Creek voluntary annexation petition.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Monica Holmes Planning, Design, and Development  
Holly Cramer Planning, Design, and Development  
Emma Knauerhase Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
§
§
The city has received a petition for voluntary annexation of private property.  
Public hearings are required prior to City Council action on annexation requests.  
This property is located within Charlotte’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.  
The area proposed for annexation shares boundaries with current city limits.  
Annexation of this area will allow for extension of city services to a site planned for redevelopment.  
The 32.29-acre “Taylor Grove at Mallard Creek” site is located southeast of North Tryon Street,  
east of Trevi Village Boulevard, and west of La Paz Place in northeastern Mecklenburg County.  
-
The property is currently occupied with single-family dwellings and accessory structures that  
will be removed prior to redevelopment.  
-
The property is zoned N2-A(CD) (Neighborhood 2-A, Conditional).  
§
Rezoning petition 2025-049 rezoned the site from N1-A to N2-A(CD).  
-
-
-
The petitioner has plans to develop up to 190 multi-family attached units.  
The property is located immediately adjacent to Council District 4.  
The petitioned area consists of two parcels: parcel identification numbers 051-091-05 and  
051-091-08.  
Consistency with City Council Policies  
§
The annexation is consistent with city voluntary annexation policy approved by the City Council on  
March 24, 2003; more specifically this annexation:  
-
-
-
Will not adversely affect the city’s ability to undertake future annexations;  
Will not have undue negative impact on city finances or services; and  
Will not result in a situation where unincorporated areas will be encompassed by new city  
limits.  
§
This voluntary annexation is being recommended because the city’s interests will be served by  
annexing the petitioned property.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
Rezoning Petition 2025-049  
31. Set a Public Hearing on the Yardly West Towne Voluntary  
Annexation  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution setting a public hearing for September 28, 2026, for the Yardly West Towne  
voluntary annexation petition.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Monica Holmes Planning, Design, and Development  
Holly Cramer Planning, Design, and Development  
Emma Knauerhase Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
§
The city has received a petition for voluntary annexation of private property.  
Public hearings are required prior to City Council action on annexation requests.  
This property is located within Charlotte’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.  
The area proposed for annexation shares boundaries with current city limits.  
Annexation of this area will allow for extension of city services to a site planned for mixed residential  
development.  
§
The 50.595-acre “Yardly West Towne” site is located along the west side of Garrison Road, south of  
West Boulevard, and east of Dixie River Road in western Mecklenburg County.  
-
-
The property is currently vacant.  
The property is zoned MX-2 INNOV (Mixed Residential - 2, Innovative Standards).  
§
Rezoning petition 2022-059 rezoned the site from MUDD-O and R-3 to MX-2 INNOV.  
-
-
-
The petitioner has plans to develop 335 multi-family residential units.  
The property is located immediately adjacent to Council District 3.  
The petitioned area consists of nine parcels: parcel identification numbers 141-141-12, 141-  
141-11, 141-141-08, 141-142-03, 141-142-04, 141-142-02, 141-141-04, 141-141-14, and  
141-141-06.  
Consistency with City Council Policies  
§
The annexation is consistent with city voluntary annexation policy approved by the City Council on  
March 24, 2003; more specifically this annexation:  
-
-
Will not adversely affect the city’s ability to undertake future annexations; and  
Will not have undue negative impact on city finances or services.  
§
§
Per policy, voluntary annexations that encompass unincorporated areas by new city limits may be  
approved if either of the following conditions exist:  
-
A petitioner for a voluntary annexation would experience a significant hardship if the  
annexation were not approved; or  
-
Under the facts of a particular voluntary annexation petition, the city’s interests are served  
by varying the application of one of more of these policies.  
This voluntary annexation is being recommended because the city’s interests will be served by  
annexing the petitioned property.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
Rezoning Petition 2022-059  
CONSENT - PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS  
32. Property Transactions - Farmway Place 6500, Parcel # 2  
Action:  
Approve the following condemnation: Farmway Place 6500, Parcel # 2  
Project: Farmway Place 6500  
Owner(s): Monteise Charell McKay and Yolanda Renea McKay aka Yolanda Renea Hutsona  
Property Address: 6600 Woodfield Drive  
Total Parcel Area: 15,000 sq. ft. (0.344 ac.)  
Property to be acquired by Easements: 804 sq. ft. (0.019 ac.) in storm drainage  
easement and 1,196 sq. ft. (0.028 ac.) in temporary construction easement  
Structures/Improvements to be impacted: None  
Landscaping to be impacted: Various shrubs and small trees  
Zoned: N1-B  
Use: Neighborhood 1-B  
Parcel Identification Number(s): 097-161-20  
Appraised Value: $5,950  
Property Owner’s Concerns: The city is unable to reach an agreement with the property  
owner.  
City’s Response to Property Owner’s Concerns: Property owner is unresponsive. The city  
continues to reach out to the property owner.  
Recommendation: The recommendation is to proceed to condemnation during which time  
negotiations can continue, mediation is available, and if necessary, just compensation can  
be determined by the court.  
Council District: 1  
Attachment(s): Map  
Adjournment  
REFERENCES  
33. Reference - Property Acquisitions and Condemnations  
§
§
The city has negotiated in good faith to acquire the properties set forth below.  
For acquisitions, the property owner and staff have agreed on a price based on appraisals and/or  
estimates.  
§
§
In the case of condemnations, the value was established by an independent, certified appraisal  
followed by a third-party appraisal review.  
Real Estate staff diligently attempts to contact all property owners by:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sending introductory letters via regular and certified mail,  
Making several site visits,  
Leaving door hangers and business cards,  
Seeking information from neighbors,  
Searching the internet,  
Obtaining title abstracts, and  
Leaving voice messages.  
§
§
For most condemnation cases, the city and the property owner(s) have been unable to reach a  
settlement. In some cases, condemnation is necessary to ensure a clear title to the property.  
If the City Council approves the resolutions, the City Attorney’s office will initiate condemnation  
proceedings. As part of the condemnation process, real estate staff and the City Attorney’s Office  
will continue to negotiate, including court-mandated mediation, in an attempt to resolve the matter.  
Most condemnation cases are settled by the parties prior to going to court.  
§
If a settlement cannot be reached, the case will proceed to a trial before a judge or jury to  
determine “just compensation.”  
§
§
Full text of each resolution is on file with the City Clerk’s Office.  
The definition of easement is a right created by grant, reservation, agreement, prescription, or  
necessary implication, which one has in the land of another, it is either for the benefit of land, such  
as right to cross A to get to B, or “in gross,” such as public utility easement.  
§
The term “fee simple” is a synonym for ownership and is an estate under which the owner is entitled  
to unrestricted powers to dispose of the property, and which can be left by will or inherited.  
34. Reference - Property Transaction Process  
Property Transaction Process Following City Council Approval for Condemnation  
The following overview is intended to provide further explanation for the process of property transactions  
that are approved by City Council for condemnation.  
Approximately six weeks of preparatory work is required before the condemnation lawsuit is filed. During  
this time, the City continues to negotiate with the property owner in an effort to reach a mutual  
settlement.  
§
If a settlement is reached, the condemnation process is stopped, and the property transaction  
proceeds to a real estate closing.  
§
If a settlement cannot be reached, the condemnation lawsuit is filed. Even after filing, negotiations  
continue between the property owner and the City’s legal representative. Filing of the  
condemnation documents allows:  
-
The City to gain access and title to the subject property so the capital project can proceed  
on schedule.  
-
The City to deposit the appraised value of the property in an escrow account with the Clerk  
of Court. These funds may be withdrawn by the property owner immediately upon filing, and  
at any time thereafter, with the understanding that additional funds transfer may be required  
at the time of final settlement or at the conclusion of litigation.  
§
If a condemnation lawsuit is filed, the final trial may not occur for 18 to 24 months; however, a vast  
majority of the cases settle prior to final trial. The City’s condemnation attorney remains actively  
engaged with the property owner to continue negotiations throughout litigation.  
-
North Carolina law requires that all condemnation cases go through formal non-binding  
mediation, at which an independent certified mediator attempts to facilitate a successful  
settlement. For the minority of cases that do not settle, the property owner has the right  
to a trial by judge or jury in order to determine the amount of compensation the property  
owner will receive.