City of Charlotte  
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center  
600 East 4th Street  
Charlotte, NC 28202  
Meeting Agenda  
Monday, June 22, 2026  
Council Chamber  
City Council Business Meeting  
Mayor Vi Lyles  
Mayor Pro Tem James Mitchell  
Council Member Dimple Ajmera  
Council Member Dante Anderson  
Council Member JD Mazuera Arias  
Council Member Ed Driggs  
Council Member Malcolm Graham  
Council Member Renee Johnson  
Council Member LaWana Mayfield  
Council Member Joi Mayo  
Council Member Kimberly Owens  
Council Member Victoria Watlington  
This meeting will also be accessible via the Government Channel, the City's Facebook page, and  
the City's YouTube channel.  
5:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS MEETING,  
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG GOVERNMENT CENTER,  
COUNCIL CHAMBER  
Call to Order  
Introductions  
Invocation  
Pledge of Allegiance  
1.  
2.  
Mayor and Council Consent Item Questions and Answers  
Staff Resource(s):  
Marie Harris, Strategy and Budget  
Time: 5 minutes  
Synopsis  
Mayor and Council may ask questions about Consent agenda items.  
Consent agenda items 25 through 59 may be considered in  
one motion except for those items removed by a Council  
member. Items are removed by notifying the City Clerk.  
Time: 10 minutes  
Consideration of Consent Items shall occur in the following order:  
A. Items that have not been pulled,  
B. Items with residents signed up to speak to the item, and  
C. Items that have been pulled for a separate vote.  
AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS  
3.  
LGBTQ Pride Month  
Action:  
Council Member Mayfield will read a proclamation recognizing June as LGBTQ Pride Month.  
4.  
Vitiligo Awareness and Education Month  
Action:  
Council Member Anderson will read a proclamation recognizing June as Vitiligo Awareness and  
Education Month.  
PUBLIC FORUM  
5. Public Forum  
APPOINTMENTS  
6. Appointment to the Planning Commission  
Action:  
Appoint residents to serve as specified.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Stephanie Kelly, City Clerk’s Office  
Explanation  
§
One appointment for a three-year term beginning July 1, 2026, and ending June 30, 2029.  
-
-
-
Emma Allen, nominated by Council members Johnson, Mayfield, Mayo, and Mazuera Arias.  
Robert Hillman, nominated by Council members Mitchell, Owens, and Watlington.  
Wil Russel, nominated by Council members Ajmera, Anderson, and Graham.  
Attachment(s)  
Planning Commission Applications  
7.  
Appointment to fill Mayoral Seat Vacancy  
Action:  
Vote to appoint a qualified candidate as mayor, effective upon the vacancy of the mayoral seat, to  
serve until the expiration of the elected mayor’s term.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Stephanie Kelly, City Clerk  
Andrea Leslie-Fite, City Attorney  
Lina James, City Attorney’s Office  
Explanation  
§
Mayor Viola Alexander Lyles submitted her notice of resignation effective June 30, 2026.  
May 26, 2026: Adoption of process and timeline  
§
City Council adopted a process and timeline to fill the mayoral vacancy and appoint a mayor,  
effective upon the mayor’s vacancy:  
-
-
-
-
June 2 - City Clerk opened application process for internal and external candidates  
June 9 - City Clerk closed application process  
June 11 - City Clerk submitted qualified candidate applications to Council  
June 15 - Council to hold an in-person Candidates Forum for qualified applicants at a special  
meeting  
-
City Council amended the application to include:  
§
§
Notice of in-person attendance at the candidates’ forum for qualified applicants, and  
Addition of a question on the applicant’s intent to seek office in the 2027 municipal  
elections.  
June 15, 2026: Candidate Forum and process/timeline amendment  
§
City Council held a special meeting to conduct the Mayoral Candidates Forum, where each qualified  
candidate was allotted two minutes to speak.  
§
Council amended the process and timeline adopted on May 26 to:  
-
-
Adopt a nomination and ballot method where each councilmember nominated up to three  
eligible nominees; and  
Adopted a process where qualified candidates ranked in the top five among all nominations  
are invited to participate in Council interviews at a special meeting to be held on June 18.  
§
June 16 - City Clerk submitted ballots of all eligible nominees to Council by noon, to be returned by  
Council to the City Clerk by end of day on June 16.  
June 18, 2026: Council Interviews of Nominees  
§
Council held a special meeting to conduct interviews of the top five candidates for the Mayor  
position nominated from the June 16 ballot, and to discuss and take any other action necessary to  
facilitate the mayoral appointment process.  
PUBLIC HEARING  
8.  
Public Hearing and Decision on the Dilworth Methodist  
Church South Historic Landmark Designation  
Action:  
A.  
Conduct a public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for the property known  
as the “Dilworth Methodist Church South” (parcel identification number 121-053-01), and  
B.  
Adopt an ordinance with an effective date of June 22, 2026, designating the property known  
as the “Dilworth Methodist Church South” (parcel identification number 121-053-01) as a  
historic landmark.  
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission Representative(s):  
Stewart Gray, Historic Landmark Department Director  
Tommy Warlick, Historic Landmarks Department Historic Preservation Specialist  
Staff Resource(s):  
Erin Chantry, Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
The city has received a recommendation from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks  
Commission (HLC) to designate the Dilworth Methodist Church South as a local historic landmark.  
Public hearings are required prior to City Council action on designation requests.  
The Dilworth Methodist Church South is located at 1829 Cleveland Avenue in Council District 1.  
Designation of this property could significantly contribute to its long-term preservation.  
The Dilworth Methodist Church South is listed under parcel identification number 121-053-01, and  
the recommended designation would include the exterior of the building and the land listed under tax  
parcel number 121-053-01.  
§
§
§
§
§
§
The property is zoned NC(EX) HDO.  
The property is owned by On Cleveland LLC, the members of which are in agreement with the  
proposed designation.  
§
Based on the current value, the potential amount of deferrable taxes would be approximately  
$4,311.09 for the City of Charlotte taxes and $7,749.28 for Mecklenburg County taxes.  
Attachment(s)  
Ordinance  
Information Sheet  
Designation Report  
9.  
Public Hearing and Decision on the Foard House Historic  
Landmark Designation  
Action:  
A.  
Conduct a public hearing to consider historic landmark designation for the property known  
as the “Foard House” (parcel identification number 107-172-19), and  
B.  
Adopt an ordinance with an effective date of June 22, 2026, designating the property known  
as the “Foard House” (parcel identification number 107-172-19) as a historic landmark.  
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks Commission Representative(s):  
Stewart Gray, Historic Landmark Department Director  
Tommy Warlick, Historic Landmarks Department Historic Preservation Specialist  
Staff Resource(s):  
Erin Chantry, Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
The city has received a recommendation from the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Historic Landmarks  
Commission (HLC) to designate the Foard House as a local historic landmark.  
Public hearings are required prior to City Council action on designation requests.  
The Foard House is located at 7410 Shady Lane in Council District 5.  
Designation of this property could significantly contribute to its long-term preservation.  
The Foard House is listed under parcel identification number 107-172-19, and the recommended  
designation would include the interior and exterior of the house and the land listed under tax parcel  
number 107-172-19.  
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
The property is zoned N1-A.  
The property is owned by Virginia L. Walker, who is in agreement with the proposed designation.  
Based on the current value, the potential amount of deferrable taxes would be approximately  
$573.78 for the City of Charlotte taxes and $1,031.47 for Mecklenburg County taxes.  
Attachment(s)  
Ordinance  
Information Sheet  
Designation Report  
10. Public Hearing and Decision on Northway Woods Phase 1  
Voluntary Annexation  
Action:  
A.  
Conduct a public hearing for Northway Woods Phase 1 voluntary annexation, and  
B.  
Adopt an annexation ordinance with an effective date of June 22, 2026, to extend the  
corporate limits to include this property and assign it to the adjacent City Council District 5.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Monica Holmes, Planning, Design, and Development  
Holly Cramer, Planning, Design, and Development  
Emma Knauerhase, Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
Public hearings to obtain community input are required prior to City Council taking action on  
annexation requests.  
§
A petition has been received from the owners of this 29.01-acre “Northway Woods Phase 1” site  
located in eastern Mecklenburg County. The property is along Frank Grier Road, south of Plaza Road  
Extension, and east of Plott Road.  
§
§
§
§
The property is owned by Northway Homes LLC, James Dexter Grier, Reginald D. Sr Grier, and Angela  
C. Grier.  
The site is currently occupied with single-family dwellings and associated accessory buildings that  
will be removed prior to any redevelopment.  
The annexation area is zoned N1-A (Neighborhood 1 - A) which allows for single-family detached  
residential uses, as well as duplexes, triplexes, and a limited number of other uses.  
The petitioned area consists of ten parcels: parcel identification numbers 108-112-08, 108-112-78,  
108-112-22, 108-112-10, 108-112-09, 108-112-55, 108-112-11, 108-112-17, 108-112-18, and 108  
-112-19.  
§
§
§
The property is located within Charlotte’s extraterritorial jurisdiction and shares boundaries with  
current city limits.  
The intent of the annexation is to extend municipal services to the site to facilitate development of  
the site with 73 single-family detached dwelling units.  
In the evaluation of this annexation area, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Stormwater Services,  
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department, Charlotte Department of Transportation, and Charlotte  
Solid Waste Services noted that this annexation area would have minimal to no impacts to the  
departments’ resources.  
§
§
In reviewing the area’s current and future uses, the Charlotte Fire Department noted that the site is  
within the Effective Response Force travel time standards.  
The potential revenue generated from this annexation area is projected to exceed the estimated  
cost of extending municipal services to the site.  
Consistent with City Council Policies  
§
The annexation is consistent with voluntary annexation policy approved by City Council on March  
24, 2003; more specifically this annexation:  
-
-
-
Will not adversely affect the city’s ability to undertake future annexations;  
Will not have undue negative impact on city finances or services; and  
Will not result in a situation where unincorporated areas will be encompassed by new city  
limits.  
Attachment(s)  
Map (GIS)  
Map (Survey)  
Annexation Ordinance  
POLICY  
11. City Manager’s Report  
.
12. Pilot Red Light Camera Program and Ordinance Revision  
Action:  
A.  
Adopt a resolution approving the Safety Committee’s recommendation to implement a pilot  
automated red-light running enforcement program for a period of one year, and  
B.  
Adopt an ordinance approving amendments to Chapter 14, Article IV-Traffic Control  
Photographic Systems of the City Code.  
Committee Chair:  
Danté Anderson, Safety Committee  
Staff Resource(s):  
Shawn Heath, City Manager’s Office  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Charlie Jones, Transportation  
Current Ordinance  
§
On March 25, 2026, the Mayor asked the Safety Committee to review whether the City of Charlotte  
should pursue the reinstatement of a red-light camera program.  
§
Red-light camera programs have been shown as an effective tool to reduce serious injury and fatal  
collisions in communities where they are deployed.  
§
§
The use of red-light cameras directly supports the city’s Vision Zero goals.  
NC Session Law 2007-341 allows for a $75 civil citation through red-light camera enforcement  
programs.  
§
§
City of Charlotte Ordinance Chapter 14, Article IV - Traffic Control Photographic Systems  
establishes a $50 civil penalty for red-light violations.  
The ordinance also prescribes an additional $50 civil citation for failure to pay, appeal, or respond to  
a violation. NC General Stature Section 160A-300.1 allows a civil penalty not to exceed $100 for  
failure to pay, appeal, or respond to a violation.  
Proposed Changes  
Amend City of Charlotte Ordinance Section 14-189. to increase the civil penalty amount of a  
§
violation detected by a traffic control photographic system to $75 and increase the civil penalty  
amount for failure to pay, appeal, or respond to a violation to $100 as permitted by NC General  
Statute.  
Committee Discussion  
§
The Safety Committee discussed the red-light camera program referral at the April 6, 2026, and May  
11, 2026, committee meetings.  
§
On April 6, 2026, the Safety Committee voted unanimously (Anderson, Ajmera, Driggs, Mitchell) to  
recommend the establishment of a red-light camera enforcement program for a period of one year  
using existing statutory approvals.  
§
Council received an overview of the committee’s recommendations and next steps at the June 8,  
2026, Council Business Meeting.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Ordinance  
Ordinance Revisions  
BUSINESS  
13. Apprenticeship Building America Grant Program  
Action:  
A.  
Accept a grant in the amount of $12,000 from ApprenticeshipNC and the North Carolina  
Community College System for Solid Waste Services apprenticeships, and  
B.  
Adopt a budget ordinance appropriating $12,000 to the General Grants Fund.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Rodney Jamison, Solid Waste Services  
Danielle Frazier, Office of Workforce Development  
Explanation  
§
This grant is part of a U.S. Department of Labor initiative for supporting the development, growth,  
and expansion of registered apprenticeship programs statewide.  
§
This funding will offset a portion of the classroom-related instruction costs, not to exceed $2,000  
per person, for coursework fees, instructional materials, and related training resources for six  
current and former apprentices in Solid Waste Services.  
§
No city matching funds are required, and no positions are created as a result of this grant.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Grant funding  
Attachment(s)  
Budget Ordinance  
14. Initial Findings Resolution on 2026 Storm Water  
Construction Period Financing  
Action:  
A.  
B.  
C.  
Adopt an initial findings resolution that makes certain Statements of Fact concerning the  
Storm Water Construction Period Financing,  
Provide for the issuance of Storm Water Construction Period Financing in an amount not to  
exceed $110,000,000, and  
Authorize city officials to take necessary actions to complete the financing, including  
making the application to the Local Government Commission.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Matthew Hastedt, Finance  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
This action authorizes a new construction period financing program for up to $110 million in  
short-term notes to provide financing for projects that are in active construction or design.  
-
-
Construction period financing such as Bond Anticipation Note (BANs) and Commercial Paper  
(CP) are commonly used debt financing tools used by municipal governments to help provide  
short term interim financing to capital projects.  
Utilizing Construction Period Financings reduces interest cost, promotes rate stability, and  
provides flexibility in the timing of the spending.  
§
The 2026 Construction Period Financing of up to $110 million is planned in two steps: a short-term  
construction period draw program lasting up to 36 months, which will then be converted into  
long-term, fixed rate revenue bonds.  
§
§
§
The $110,000,000 financing will be used on approved major and minor flood control projects and can  
be supported with current revenues.  
City Council will be asked to consider approval of the Bond Order related to these actions at the  
August 10, 2026, Business Meeting.  
The North Carolina Local Government Commission is expected to review and approve this financing  
on August 4, 2026.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Debt Service Fund  
Attachment(s)  
Initial Findings Resolution  
15. General Obligation Refunding Bonds  
Action:  
A.  
B.  
C.  
D.  
E.  
F.  
Adopt an Initial Finding Resolution authorizing refunding of existing outstanding General  
Obligation Bonds series 2016A not to exceed $59,000,000,  
Introduce a bond order authorizing the issuance of General Obligation Refunding Bonds not  
to exceed $59,000,000,  
Adopt the bond order to provide for the issuance of General Obligation Refunding Bonds not  
to exceed $59,000,000,  
Adopt a resolution to authorize issuance of General Obligation Refunding Bonds for  
refunding of General Obligation Bonds, series 2016A,  
Authorize City Officials to take necessary actions to complete the financing, including  
making the application to the Local Government Commission, and  
Adopt a budget ordinance appropriating $59,000,000 to the Municipal Debt Service Fund.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Matt Hastedt, Finance  
Mitali Shah, Finance  
Explanation  
§
The city continually evaluates outstanding debt for refunding opportunities to achieve savings,  
reduce risk, and to modernize financing documents.  
This action will:  
§
-
-
Provide information required for Local Government Commission approval of the financing,  
Provide approval to the City Manager and the Authorized Officers named in the Resolution to  
take necessary actions to complete the financing and related documentation for the life of  
the debt.  
-
Refund approximately $59,000,000 of the 2016A General Obligation bonds.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Funding: Municipal Debt Service Fund  
Attachment(s)  
Resolutions  
Bond Order  
Budget Ordinance  
16. General Obligation Bond Referendum  
Action:  
A.  
Introduce each of the three bond orders required for a General Obligation Bond Referendum,  
which includes $280,000,000 of Transportation Bonds, $20,000,000 of Neighborhood  
Improvement Bonds, and $125,000,000 of Housing Bonds, and  
B.  
Approve a resolution setting a public hearing on each of the bond orders for August 10,  
2026.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Matthew Hastedt, Finance  
Mitali Shah, Finance  
Explanation  
§
On June 8, 2026, Council approved:  
-
-
The Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Budget and FY 2027-2031 Capital Investment Plan, which includes  
a $425,000,000 bond referendum on November 3, 2026; and  
Resolutions authorizing staff to proceed with actions necessary to conduct a General  
Obligation Bond Referendum.  
§
§
The current action is the second of four City Council actions. This action will specifically:  
-
-
Introduce the bond orders for each of the ballot questions; and  
Approve a resolution setting a public hearing for each of the bond orders for the August 10,  
2026, business meeting.  
A state law enacted in 2023 requires that the ballot questions for General Obligation Bond referenda  
explicitly state the estimated total principal and interest costs over the lifetime of the bond, the  
estimated property tax increase that could be necessary to service these costs, and that additional  
property taxes may be levied in order to pay these costs.  
-
Based on the city’s Steady State modelling of debt capacity, the tax rate included in the FY  
2027 Budget is projected to support the cost of these bonds without any future increases.  
The property tax increase included in the FY 2027 Budget supports General Fund  
investments in public safety and is not related to the cost of these bonds.  
-
§
In accordance with State law, the Chief Financial Officer will file a statement of disclosures, which  
includes estimated interest and the estimated property tax increase mentioned above, for each of  
the ballot questions. The estimates are non-binding. The Chief Financial Officer will also file a sworn  
statement of debt with the City Clerk.  
Next Steps  
§
On August 10, 2026, City Council will be asked to hold a public hearing on each of the bond orders,  
approve the bond orders, and adopt a resolution setting a special bond referendum for November 3,  
2026 (including the form and language of the ballot).  
§
After November 3, 2026, City Council will be asked to adopt a resolution certifying and declaring the  
results of the special bond referendum. This action will occur after the Mecklenburg County Board of  
Elections certifies the results of the vote.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Municipal Debt Service Fund  
Attachment(s)  
Bond Orders  
Resolution setting Notice of Public Hearing  
17. University City Municipal Service District Boundary  
Expansion  
Action:  
Adopt an ordinance approving the expansion of the University City Municipal Service District.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Alyson Craig, City Manager’s Office  
Shahid Rana, Economic Development  
Explanation  
§
This action requests the second of two required approvals by City Council for the expansion of  
Municipal Service District (MSD) 5 (University City).  
-
According to NC General Statute Section 160A-537(f), “no ordinance defining a service  
district as provided for in this section shall be finally adopted until it has been passed at two  
meetings of the city council by majority vote of the voting members present, and no service  
district shall be defined except by ordinance.”  
§
§
§
The first approval occurred along with Budget Adoption on June 8, 2026.  
This action requests City Council to adopt the ordinance a second and final time.  
University City Partners serves as the administrators for Municipal Service District 5, which is  
located in Council District 4.  
§
A boundary expansion of MSD 5 was included in the Manager’s Proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027  
Budget, which was presented on May 4, 2026.  
§
§
§
On January 16, 2026, University City Partners requested a boundary expansion for FY 2027.  
Council received information about the potential boundary expansion on January 29, 2026.  
On March 5, 2026, the Budget, Governance, and Intergovernmental Relations Committee received  
an overview of the potential boundary expansion.  
Policy  
§
State law allows cities to create MSDs to promote economic development and/or provide services  
at a higher level in the district than provided for the entire city.  
§
§
§
Urban development/redevelopment areas are one of the municipal services for which a district can  
be created.  
MSDs are funded through an assessment on all property owners within the district boundaries. All  
the money raised by the MSD assessment must be spent on district enhancement programs.  
In accordance with NC General Statute Section 160A-536, projects funded through MSD revenue  
may include, but are not limited to:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Expansions/improvements to support utility provision, street lighting, streets and sidewalks;  
Construction of pedestrian and bicycle paths;  
Construction of public buildings;  
Improvements to relieve traffic congestion;  
Improvements to reduce the incidence of crime;  
Providing city services or functions in addition to or to a greater extent than those provided  
for the entire city; and  
-
Promoting business investment and economic vitality by sponsoring events, coordinating  
public private partnerships, and providing marketing support.  
§
The city currently has MSDs in Center City, South End, University City, and SouthPark.  
Boundaries  
§
The current MSD 5 boundary follows property lines and includes properties between the Highway  
29/49 connector off I-85 on the south, the rear property line of parcels on the west side of Mallard  
Creek Road on the west, Mallard Creek Church Road and some adjacent commercial properties on  
the north, and the rear property line of parcels on the east side of Highway 49 on the east.  
State law outlines several guidelines for determining boundaries of municipal service districts.  
Properties within the MSD 5 boundaries must satisfy at least one of the following guidelines:  
§
-
Location in or surrounding existing or redeveloping concentrations of retail, office, or  
significant employment-generating uses,  
-
Surrounding major institutional uses, such as a university or hospital, and  
-
Location within 1,500 feet of major transportation and transit corridors, except for residential  
parcels which must be within 150 feet.  
§
The proposed MSD 5 boundary expansion extends the existing district north and northeast to  
include additional properties that are contiguous to, and functionally part of, the University City  
Town Center, including:  
-
-
-
Properties beginning at the current northern edge of the district near JW Clay Boulevard and  
extending northward to include areas along and south of Mallard Creek Church Road between  
North Tryon Street on the west and Mallard Creek Road on the east;  
Properties east of Mallard Creek Church Road including those bounded by University City  
Boulevard and the Mecklenburg County line, following parcel lines and natural edges where  
applicable; and  
Properties located north of I-85 in the vicinity of Pavilion Boulevard and surrounding parcels,  
while generally limiting further northern extension to areas consistent with existing  
development patterns and roadway boundaries.  
§
The proposed boundary continues to follow property lines and major transportation corridors,  
including North Tryon Street, JW Clay Boulevard, Mallard Creek Church Road, Mallard Creek Road, I-  
85, and University City Boulevard, creating a contiguous and cohesive district that aligns with the  
primary commercial, retail, and economic activity areas of University City.  
Community Input  
§
§
§
University City Partners utilized a mix of outreach methods to ensure diverse participation including  
listening sessions, public information sessions, digital outreach, and informational postcards.  
Key outcomes of engagement efforts include over 19,453 emails sent, 2,094 postcards mailed, 240  
outreach surveys completed, and 286 in-person outreach interactions with rate payers.  
A public hearing on the boundary expansion was held May 11, 2026.  
Attachment(s)  
University City Partners Request Packet  
University City Partner Engagement Report  
18. Accept Habitat for Humanity Contribution for the Robinson  
Church Road Widening Project  
Action:  
A.  
Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to accept a contribution in the amount of  
$52,000 from Habitat for Humanity of the Charlotte Region, Inc. for the Robinson Church  
Road Widening Phase 1 project, and  
B.  
Adopt a budget ordinance appropriating $52,000 from Habitat for Humanity of the Charlotte  
Region, Inc. to the General Capital Projects Fund.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Phil Reiger, General Services  
Kathleen Cishek, General Services  
Keith Bryant, General Services  
Explanation  
§
The Robinson Church Road Widening Phase 1 project will include the construction of landscaped  
medians, curb and gutter, shared-use paths, planting strips, and a roundabout from Harris Boulevard  
to the intersection of Plott Road and Highland Avenue in Council District 5.  
On June 8, 2026, City Council approved the Big Moves 2030 program in the Fiscal Years 2027-2031  
Capital Investment Plan. This project is one of the seven projects included in the Big Moves 2030  
program.  
§
§
§
Habitat for Humanity contributed $52,000 for site improvements which will be applied toward eligible  
project construction costs.  
The Habitat for Humanity improvements are located within the project limits, and their $52,000  
contribution will allow a 12-foot shared-use path and accessible ramp elements to be constructed  
as part of the city project, helping avoid duplicate construction and future removal of newly  
installed improvements.  
§
The project is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2031.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Capital Projects Fund  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Budget Ordinance  
19. Interlocal Agreement with the Town of Mint Hill for  
Construction of Water and Sewer Infrastructure  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an interlocal agreement  
with the Town of Mint Hill for construction of sanitary sewer lines and a water storage tank.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This interlocal agreement is for the installation of a 16-inch gravity sanitary sewer line through  
Veterans Memorial Park in the Town of Mint Hill (adjacent to Council District 5) and the construction  
of an elevated water storage tank with a one-color exterior finish, located at 12910 Palomino Drive  
in the Town of Mint Hill.  
§
§
§
These components will be incorporated into the Charlotte Water Infrastructure system.  
The Town of Mint Hill will donate easements for the project.  
Council will be asked to consider approval of the construction contract for this project at a future  
Business Meeting.  
Attachment(s)  
Resolution  
Maps  
20. Amendment to the Amended and Restated Lease for the  
Bank of America Stadium  
Action:  
Authorize the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and execute all documents necessary to  
complete a First Amendment to Amended and Restated Lease for the Bank of America Stadium  
property (parcel identification numbers 073-281-01A and 073-281-02) with Panthers Stadium,  
LLC.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Shawn Heath, City Manager’s Office  
Scott Hester, City Attorney’s Office  
Explanation  
§
The North Carolina Department of Transportation has conveyed to the city approximately 0.244  
acres of real property referred to as the “Triangle Parcel” located along South Graham Street in  
Council District 2.  
§
The city and Panthers Stadium, LLC desire to enter into a First Amendment to the Amended and  
Restated Lease to modify the collective Property as described in the Amended and Restated Lease  
to include the Triangle Parcel in the portion of land to described as the Performance Venue Land  
adjacent to Bank of America Stadium.  
Background  
§
On June 24, 2024, City Council authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and  
execute agreements between the city and Panthers Stadium, LLC, for the Bank of America Stadium  
Improvements Project.  
-
The project includes: investments to maintain and enhance the stadium; building a new Field  
House; accessibility and sustainability improvements; and other renovations to help to  
deliver world-class entertainment and related economic impacts for the city.  
§
On October 13, 2025, City Council authorized the City Manager, or his designee, to negotiate and  
execute additional ground lease provisions for inclusion in the Amended and Restated Ground Lease  
that contemplate the inclusion of a free-standing performance venue on a portion of the Bank of  
America Stadium property.  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
21. Amendment to Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning  
Organization Memorandum of Understanding  
Action:  
Authorize the Mayor to execute an amended Memorandum of Understanding for the Charlotte  
Regional Transportation Planning Organization to remove the Metropolitan Transit Commission and  
add the Metropolitan Public Transportation Authority as a member.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Liz Babson, City Manager’s Office  
Monica Holmes, Planning, Design, and Development  
Robert Cook, Planning, Design, and Development  
Explanation  
§
The City of Charlotte is the lead planning agency for the Charlotte Regional Transportation Planning  
Organization (CRTPO), the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) for the Charlotte urban area.  
The City of Charlotte is one of 21 municipalities, three counties, two North Carolina Board of  
Transportation seats, and a transit policy board- the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), that  
have representation on the CRTPO Policy Board, which is responsible for carrying out the  
metropolitan planning process as specified in federal statutes. Federal regulations that govern MPOs  
require public transit agencies to have representation on MPO Policy Boards.  
§
§
§
The CRTPO’s Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is the governing document for the organization  
that guides the cooperative, comprehensive, and continuing transportation planning process for the  
planning area.  
Consistent with the Projects for Advancing Vehicle-Infrastructure Enhancements (PAVE) Act, which  
requires the termination of the Transit Governance Interlocal Agreement and the dissolution of the  
MTC by July 1, 2026, City Council adopted a resolution and authorized the City Manager to  
negotiate and execute all documents necessary to complete the Termination Agreement for the  
Transit Governance Interlocal Agreement on April 27, 2026.  
§
§
§
§
Following the dissolution of the MTC, the Metropolitan Public Transportation Authority (MPTA) will  
be the public transit agency and will take its place as a voting member with one weighted vote.  
The CRTPO Board received information at their May 20, 2026, meeting, and approved this  
amendment at their June 17, 2026, meeting.  
Action is requested of all 27 voting members of the CRPTO Board to authorize their Mayor or Chief  
Elected Official to execute an amended MOU to reflect this change.  
The North Carolina Governor must execute the revised MOU before it can be submitted to the  
Federal Highway Administration to be considered the current MOU. Following execution of the  
amended MOU by the Governor or his designee, the MPTA will have voting privileges.  
Background  
§
On July 1, 2025, the PAVE Act was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly. The PAVE Act  
authorized Mecklenburg County to obtain an additional source of revenue to expand and improve  
roadway systems and public transportation for the Mecklenburg County region by assessing a  
one-percent local sales and use tax subject to voter approval.  
§
§
§
§
On November 4, 2025, Mecklenburg County voters approved the one-percent local sales tax  
referendum as outlined by the PAVE Act.  
On December 2, 2025, the Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners adopted a resolution to levy  
the one-percent local sales tax effective July 1, 2026.  
On December 18, 2025, the inaugural MPTA Board Meeting was held, oaths of office were  
administered to the Board of Trustees, and Board positions were elected.  
On March 25, 2026, the MTC discussed the termination of the Transit Governance Interlocal  
Agreement and dissolution of the MTC and requested all voting members (except the North Carolina  
Department of Transportation) present a resolution to their respective boards for adoption in  
advance of July 1, 2026.  
Attachment(s)  
Revised CRTPO MOU  
Memorandum to CRTPO Explaining Changes  
22. Primary Interlocal Agreement for Implementation and  
Fulfillment of the Projects for Advancing  
Vehicle-Infrastructure Enhancements Act  
Action:  
A.  
Adopt a resolution approving and ratifying an interlocal agreement between the City of  
Charlotte and the Metropolitan Public Transportation Authority for their joint undertaking  
and implementation of requirements to fulfill obligations under the Projects for Advancing  
Vehicle-Infrastructure Enhancements Act, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute all documents and contracts, including  
for transfer and expenditure of funds necessary to implement and fulfill the city’s  
obligations under the Projects for Advancing Vehicle-Infrastructure Enhancements Act and  
the interlocal agreement.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Andrea Leslie-Fite, City Attorney  
Lina James, City Attorney’s Office  
Liz Babson, City Manager’s Office  
Shawn Heath, City Manager’s Office  
Explanation  
§
Effective July 1, 2026, the Projects for Advancing Vehicle-Infrastructure Enhancements (PAVE) Act  
requires the City of Charlotte to transfer its transit operations to the Metropolitan Public  
Transportation Authority (MPTA). Because the parties recognize the benefits of a phased transition  
and share a desire for a smooth transition, the city will operate the transit system through the  
transition period, which is anticipated to extend through December 31, 2026.  
The Primary Interlocal Agreement is intended to address critical items that require mutual agreement  
to begin the initial phase of operations on July 1, 2026, and create a long-term plan for the transfer  
of assets and repayment of debts.  
§
§
The Primary Interlocal Agreement is divided into three phases:  
-
Phase One: Begins July 1, 2026, and is anticipated to end on December 31, 2026. During this  
phase, the city will continue to operate the transit system with the MPTA’s governance and  
policy oversight. The MPTA will continue to establish the infrastructure, systems, and  
approvals necessary to own and operate a public transportation system and to employ staff  
that support its operations.  
-
-
Phase Two: Anticipated to begin on January 1, 2027, and anticipated to end on June 30,  
2027. During this phase, the city may provide some shared services in support of the  
operation of the public transportation system to ensure a smooth transition.  
Phase Three: Anticipated to begin July 1, 2027, and anticipated to end once (i) all CATS  
debt has been repaid, (ii) all grant requirements have been satisfied, and (iii) all assets have  
been transferred to the MPTA. During this phase, the city and the MPTA will operate  
independently except to address outstanding debt obligations, grant requirements, and the  
transfer of encumbered assets.  
§
On June 10, 2026, the MPTA Board of Trustees unanimously adopted and ratified the Primary  
Interlocal Agreement, which will be submitted by the MPTA to the North Carolina General Assembly  
by June 30, 2026, to ensure all PAVE Act requirements are satisfied. The Agreement will become  
effective on July 1, 2026.  
§
§
Additional agreements between the city and the MPTA are anticipated prior to the conclusion of  
Phase One and Phase Two.  
Under Interlocal Cooperation law, Article 20 of Chapter 160A of the North Carolina General Statutes,  
the city and MPTA are authorized to enter into interlocal agreements for the joint cooperation and  
exercise of powers and the performance of governmental functions, including to perform jointly any  
function that they have the power to perform alone, or to contract with one another to perform  
any governmental function that they have the power to perform alone, and to enter into contracts  
to specify the details of these joint undertakings, including the transfer to and expenditure of funds  
collected by any participating unit of government to another consistent with the parties’  
agreements.  
Background  
§
§
§
On July 1, 2025, the PAVE Act was enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly. The PAVE Act  
authorized Mecklenburg County to obtain an additional source of revenue to expand and improve  
roadway systems and public transportation for the Mecklenburg County region by assessing a  
one-percent local sales and use tax subject to voter approval.  
On November 4, 2025, Mecklenburg County voters approved the one-percent local sales tax  
referendum as outlined by the PAVE Act, and on December 2, 2025, the Mecklenburg County Board  
of Commissioners adopted a resolution to levy the one-percent local sales tax effective July 1,  
2026.  
The Mayor established a City Council work group comprising of Council members Driggs, Owens, and  
Watlington to advise on the development of the Primary Interlocal Agreement. The work group met  
with staff regularly for progress updates, offered real-time feedback to staff during negotiations,  
and provided summaries to Council’s Transportation, Planning, and Development Committee and to  
full City Council.  
§
§
On March 2, 2026, the City Attorney and the city’s outside legal counsel, Parker Poe, provided an  
overview of the transfer process under the PAVE Act, including the need for an interlocal  
agreement, to City Council during the Annual Strategy Meeting.  
On April 6 and May 4, Council Member Driggs, Chair of the Transportation, Planning, and  
Development Committee, provided informational updates on the transition process to the  
Committee. Both updates were accompanied by a memo provided to City Council that summarized  
the update.  
§
§
On May 7, an initial draft of the Primary Interlocal Agreement was distributed to City Council for  
review and comment.  
On June 1, the City Attorney and the city’s outside legal counsel provided an update on changes to  
the draft Primary Interlocal Agreement compared to the May 7 draft to the Transportation, Planning,  
and Development Committee.  
§
§
On June 3, a second draft of the Primary Interlocal Agreement was distributed to City Council for  
review and comment.  
On June 8, a final draft of the Primary Interlocal Agreement with mutual agreement on all provisions  
was distributed to City Council for review and comment. Additionally, the City Attorney and the  
city’s outside legal presented to full City Council at the June 8, 2026, Business Meeting. This  
presentation addressed specific questions or concerns raised by Council members over the past  
month and included a summary of changes to the Primary Interlocal Agreement compared to the  
draft initially distributed on May 7.  
§
On May 18, May 20, May 26, June 5, and June 8, the City Attorney’s Office, the city’s outside legal  
counsel, and city staff hosted optional office hours for City Council.  
Attachment(s)  
Resolution  
Primary Interlocal Agreement  
23. Mayor and Council Topics  
.
24. Closed Session  
CONSENT  
25. Transportation Asset Data Collection Services  
Action:  
A.  
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a unit price contract with Roadway  
Asset Services, LLC for transportation asset data collection services for a term of one year,  
and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Debbie Smith, Transportation  
Charlie Jones, Transportation  
Explanation  
§
The Charlotte Department of Transportation maintains and preserves a multi-modal transportation  
system, including approximately 5,500 lane miles of streets, 195 miles of bicycle facilities, over 1,000  
traffic signals, and over 200,000 street signs.  
§
§
Maintaining the assets of our mobility network is a key component of supporting the city’s mobility  
policies and vision.  
The transportation asset data collection project will result in complete inventories of signs,  
pavement markings, pavement conditions, and other roadway assets to be used in the ongoing  
maintenance, repair, and replacement of the transportation network.  
The data collected will be used to provide more proactive maintenance activities throughout the  
city, supporting traffic safety and asset management.  
§
§
§
On April 6, 2026, the city issued a Request for Qualifications; 10 responses were received.  
Roadway Asset Services, LLC. best meets the city’s needs in terms of qualifications and experience  
based on similar-sized projects.  
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $650,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because the scope of work required does not present  
viable subcontracting opportunities. Roadway Asset Services, LLC will be responsible for 100% of the work,  
and there are no opportunities to include subcontractors. This assessment was confirmed by CBI and the  
respective department after reviewing the project’s scope and potential for division into subcontracting  
opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Capital Investment Plan  
26. Bryant Farms Road Extension Phase Two Design-Build  
Project  
Action:  
Approve a contract in the amount of $4,981,588 with Blythe Development, LLC for design-build  
initial design services for the Bryant Farms Road Extension Phase Two Design-Build Project.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Phil Reiger, General Services  
Kathleen Cishek, General Services  
Keith Bryant, General Services  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
This project will improve east-west connectivity in the Ballantyne/South Charlotte area from Rea  
Road to Ardrey Kell Road in Council District 7.  
On June 8, 2026, City Council approved the Big Moves 2030 program in the Fiscal Years 2027-2031  
Capital Investment Plan. This project is one of the seven projects included in Big Moves 2030.  
Work will include the extension of Bryant Farms Road from Rea Road to Ardrey Kell Road, including a  
bridge over Flat Branch Creek.  
Other improvements will include:  
-
Installation of a traffic signal at two intersections (Tom Short Road/Bryant Farms Road and  
Ardrey Kell Road/Bryant Farms Road),  
-
-
A new 36-inch water main, and  
Vehicle travel lanes, turn lanes, and multi-use paths.  
§
§
On January 20, 2026, the city issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ); three responses were  
received.  
Blythe Development, LLC is the best qualified firm to meet the city’s needs on the basis of  
demonstrated competence and qualification of professional services in response to the RFQ  
requirements.  
§
Design-Build consists of two phases. The design phase delivers the project design, and the  
construction phase will provide a guaranteed maximum price to finalize the design and construct the  
project.  
§
§
The city’s design-build delivery method is in conformance with NC General Statue Section 143-  
128.1(a) and consistent with the Design-Build Institute of America best practices.  
A future amendment will be requested for the construction phase of the project.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
The city negotiates contract participation for Design-Build contracts after the firm is selected, and scopes  
of work are defined for design and construction services. Blythe Development, LLC has committed  
($735,300) or approximately 14.76% of the contract for design services or approved tasks. An MBE and  
W/SBE goal will be established for the construction phase of this project once design development  
documents are at a reasonable level of completion. Blythe Development, LLC has the opportunity to  
increase the goal throughout the life of the project.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
27. City Vehicles and Equipment  
Action:  
A.  
B.  
Approve the purchase of vehicles and equipment from a cooperative contract,  
Approve unit price contracts for the purchase of vehicles and equipment for a term of one  
year under North Carolina Sheriff’s Association contracts with the following:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amick Equipment Co., Inc. (#26-10-0422R),  
Aquip, LLC (#26-10-0422R),  
Atlantic Emergency Solutions, Inc. (#27-11-0421),  
Charlotte Truck Center dba Excel Truck Group - Charlotte (#26-10-0422R),  
CUES, Inc. (#26-10-0422R),  
Godwin Manufacturing Co., Inc. (#26-10-0422R),  
Joe Johnson Equipment dba Public Works Equipment (#26-10-0422R),  
Knapheide Truck Equipment Co. Midsouth (#27-11-0421),  
Vanguard Truck Centers (#27-11-0421),  
Velocity Truck Centers - Wilmington (#26-10-0422R),  
C.  
Approve unit price contracts for the purchase of vehicles and equipment for a term of one  
year under Sourcewell contracts with the following:  
-
-
Altec Industries, Inc. (#091125-ALT),  
ASH North America, Inc., dba Aebi Schmidt North America and M-B Companies  
(#050625-MBC),  
-
-
-
-
Caterpillar Inc. (#020223-CAT),  
Gradall Industries, Inc. (#011723-GRD),  
Multiquip Inc. (#020923-MTQ),  
Vermeer Manufacturing Company dba Vermeer Corporation (#030923-VRM), and  
D.  
Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract for additional terms as long as the  
cooperative contracts are in effect, at prices and terms that are the same or more favorable  
than those offered under the cooperative contacts.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Phil Reiger, General Services  
David Wolfe, General Services  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
City vehicles and equipment are assessed on an annual basis to determine replacement needs based  
on a rating of vehicle usage, age, maintenance costs, and condition.  
§
Purchased vehicles and equipment include electric vehicles, heavy trucks, light duty vehicles and  
pickup trucks, medium duty trucks, refuse trucks, runway maintenance trucks, vans, and utility  
vehicles.  
§
§
NC General Statute Section 143-129(e)(3) allows local governments to purchase from formally  
organized cooperative purchasing contracts.  
A cooperative purchasing agreement results from the consolidation and competitive solicitation of  
multiple public agency requirements. By aggregating common needs all agencies are able to leverage  
economies of scale, such as volume discounts, improved terms and conditions, reduced  
administrative costs, and access to professional and technical expertise.  
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $21,500,000.  
§
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General and Enterprise Capital Equipment Funds  
28. University City Boulevard Pedestrian Crossings  
Action:  
Approve a contract in the amount of $968,115.50 to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder  
United of Carolinas, Inc. for the University City Boulevard Pedestrian Crossings project.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Phil Reiger, General Services  
Kathleen Cishek, General Services  
Keith Bryant, General Services  
Explanation  
§
§
§
This project will improve pedestrian connectivity along University City Boulevard between and at the  
intersections with Mark Twain Road and Suther Road in Council District 4.  
Work will include approximately 270 feet of 12-foot shared-use path, curb ramps, crosswalks, storm  
drainage improvements, a pedestrian refuge island, and pedestrian signals.  
On April 2, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; one bid was received.  
-
NC General Statute 143-132 prohibits municipalities from awarding construction contracts  
over $500,000 without receiving at least three competitive bids from the initial  
advertisement of the contract. The city may subsequently award the contract even if  
readvertisements result in fewer than three competitive bids.  
§
§
§
On May 7, 2026, the city reissued the invitation to bid; one bid was received.  
United Carolinas, Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2027.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Established MBE Goal: 5.00%  
Committed MBE Goal: 5.16%  
United of the Carolinas, Inc. exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 5.16% ($50,000)  
of the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
RRC Concrete Inc. (MBE) ($50,000) (concrete)  
Established WBE Goal: 11.00%  
Committed WBE Goal: 11.36%  
United of the Carolinas, Inc. exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 11.36%  
($110,000) of the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
Parsi Trucking LLC (WBE) ($110,000) (hauling)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: General Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
29. Water Mitigation and Emergency Clean-Up Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve contracts for water mitigation and emergency clean-up services for a term of three  
years with the following:  
-
-
-
-
-
AdvantaClean of Monroe,  
Cardinal Restoration,  
Reliable Restorations (MBE, SBE),  
Servpro of South Charlotte  
Sunshine Restoration Group, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for one, two-year term with possible  
price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for which the  
contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Phil Reiger, General Services  
David Wolfe, General Services  
Bill Witherell, General Services  
Explanation  
§
General Services is responsible for maintaining a portfolio of more than 200 municipal facilities,  
structures, and assets with a range of uses including office, warehouse, storage, parking, vehicle  
maintenance, communication towers, cultural facilities, and public safety.  
Services are needed for containment, demolition, disposal, drying, cleaning, and decontamination as  
needed per industry-recognized best practices for restoration and remediation work after water or  
smoke damage.  
§
§
§
On April 27, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); seven responses were received.  
The selected companies best meet the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, and  
responsiveness to the RFP requirements.  
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $335,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Reliable Restorations is a city-certified MBE and SBE. Contract goals were not established for this contract  
because the scope of work required does not present viable subcontracting opportunities. The selected  
companies will be responsible for 100% of the work, and there are no opportunities to include  
subcontractors. This assessment was confirmed by CBI and the respective departments after reviewing the  
project’s scope and potential for division into subcontracting opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets  
30. Consulting Services for the Lee S. Dukes Water Treatment  
Plant Expansion  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract with Hazen and Sawyer for consulting services for the Lee S. Dukes  
Water Treatment Plant Expansion and Associated Infrastructure project for a term of two  
years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to four, two-year terms and to  
amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
This contract will provide consulting services for the Lee S. Dukes Water Treatment Plant (WTP)  
Expansion project located in Huntersville, adjacent to Council Districts 2 and 4.  
The consultant will provide specialized expertise and supplement the city’s resources during various  
phases of project delivery.  
On January 23, 2026, the city issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ); five responses were  
received.  
Hazen and Sawyer was determined to be the best qualified firm to meet the city’s needs on the  
basis of demonstrated competence and qualification of professional services in response to the RFQ  
requirements.  
§
§
The Lee S. Dukes WTP Expansion project is estimated to be complete in December 2034 with an  
interim milestone complete in December 2031. The consultant would serve through the one-year  
warranty period concluding in 2035.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $1,500,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
The city negotiates contract participation after the proposal selection process. Hazen and Sawyer has  
identified the following certified firms to be utilized as scopes of work are defined:  
§
§
§
§
Amplify Consulting LLC dba Civility Localized (MBE, SBE) (public outreach)  
CES Group Engineers LLP (WBE) (site surveying)  
EDT, PLLC (MBE) (construction inspection services)  
Froehling & Robertson Inc. (MBE) (geotechnical investigations, report, construction materials  
testing)  
§
§
§
§
Gulf Coast LLC (SBE) (easement acquisition)  
Mid-Carolina Reprographics (WBE) (document reproduction)  
Neighboring Concepts, PLLC (MBE) (architectural support services)  
Sweetwater Utility Exploration LLC (WBE) (utility locates of existing utilities)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
31. Engineering Services for Reclaimed Water Systems  
Action:  
A.  
Approve contract amendment #1 for $1,552,030 to the contract with Garver, LLC for  
engineering services for reclaimed water systems, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract and this amendment were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Joseph Lockler, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This contract provides project management, system evaluation, design development, and permitting  
for improvements to the reclaimed water systems at Mallard Creek Water Resource Recovery Facility  
(WRRF) in Council District 4.  
§
On October 13, 2025, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a contract  
with Garver, LLC for $901,818 for the engineering services for reclaimed water systems.  
-
Additional needed improvements have been identified since the original contract with Garver,  
LLC was executed. This amendment will include the design of a new high service pump  
station and ground storage tanks for the reclaimed water system.  
§
The new estimated value of the contract including this amendment is $2,453,848.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
All additional work involved in this amendment will be performed by Garver, LLC and their existing  
subconsultants.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
32. Municipal Agreement for Relocation and Installation of  
Water Infrastructure along I-77  
Action:  
A.  
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a municipal  
agreement with the North Carolina Department of Transportation for construction of water  
and sanitary sewer line relocations, adjustments, and improvements, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to approve the reimbursement request for the actual cost of the  
utility construction.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This municipal agreement is for the relocation of water and sanitary sewer infrastructure located  
within the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (NCDOT) highway improvements project I-  
5715 (I-77 Interchange Improvements) located along I-77 at NC-73 and within the limits of the  
Town of Huntersville (adjacent to Council District 4).  
§
As required by NCDOT’s encroachment agreements, the city is financially responsible for the cost to  
relocate city-owned water and sanitary sewer lines within the state-maintained right-of-way.  
The city will reimburse NCDOT for actual construction costs at the conclusion of the project.  
The total estimated city cost of this construction is $7,501,976.36.  
§
§
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
33. Municipal Agreement for Relocation and Installation of  
Water Infrastructure along NC-73  
Action:  
A.  
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute a municipal  
agreement with the North Carolina Department of Transportation for construction of water  
and sanitary sewer line relocations, adjustments, and improvements, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to approve the reimbursement request for the actual cost of the  
utility construction.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This municipal agreement is for the relocation of water and sanitary sewer infrastructure located  
within the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (NCDOT) highway improvements project U-  
5765 (NC-73 Improvements) located along NC-73 from West Catawba Avenue to I-77 and within  
the limits of the Town of Huntersville (adjacent to Council District 4).  
§
As required by NCDOT’s encroachment agreements, the city is financially responsible for the cost to  
relocate city-owned water and sanitary sewer lines within the state-maintained right-of-way.  
The city will reimburse NCDOT for actual construction costs at the conclusion of the project.  
The total estimated city cost of this construction is $13,210,686.68.  
§
§
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
Resolution  
34. Pavement, Landscape, and Roadway Structures Repair  
Construction  
Action:  
Approve a contract in the amount of $20,294,107.96 to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder  
Onsite Development, LLC for pavement, landscape, and roadway structures repair construction.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Carl Wilson, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
§
This contract will provide sitework including pavement, landscape, and roadway structures.  
On April 7, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; one bid was received.  
-
NC General Statute 143-132 prohibits municipalities from awarding construction contracts  
over $500,000 without receiving at least three competitive bids from the initial  
advertisement of the contract. The city may subsequently award the contract even if  
readvertisements result in fewer than three competitive bids.  
§
§
§
On May 5, 2026, the city reissued the ITB; one bid was received.  
Onsite Development, LLC was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2030.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because the scope of work or goods does not  
present viable subcontracting opportunities. OnSite Development, LLC will be responsible 100% of the work  
or goods, and there are no opportunities to include subcontractors. This assessment was confirmed by CBI  
and the respective department after reviewing the project’s scope and potential for division into  
subcontracting opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
35. Water Facility Security System  
Action:  
A.  
B.  
C.  
Approve the purchase of security system equipment and installation services by the sole  
source exemption,  
Approve a contract with Eastway Lock & Key, Inc. for the purchase of security system  
equipment and installation services for a term of five years, and  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Joseph Lockler, Charlotte Water  
Travis Hunnicutt, Charlotte Water  
Sole Source Exemption  
§
NC General Statute Section 143-129(e)(6) provides that formal bidding requirements do not apply  
when:  
-
-
-
Performance or price competition is not available;  
A needed product is available from only one source or supply; or  
Standardization or compatibility is the overriding consideration.  
§
§
Sole sourcing is necessary for this contract due to the need for standardization and compatibility  
with existing equipment and because Eastway lock & Key Inc. is the sole licensee of the system.  
City Council approval is required for any purchases made under the sole source exception.  
Explanation  
§
§
§
This contract will provide for the continued purchase of standardized enhanced-security physical  
system equipment and installation within Charlotte Water facilities.  
Eastway Lock & Key, Inc. is the sole licensee of the patented and restricted system required to  
install the system.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $60,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Sole sourcing was required for this contract due to the need for standardization and compatibility with  
existing equipment and because Eastway lock & Key Inc. is the sole licensee of the system. Sole source  
contracts are exempt from CBI Program goals, as these contracts do not involve a competitive bidding  
process and do not present opportunities for subcontracting. This aligns with what is required by NC  
General Statute Section 143-129(e)(3).  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan and Charlotte Water Operating Budget  
36. Water Infrastructure Construction  
Action:  
Approve a contract in the amount of $2,901,781.05 to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder R.  
H. Price, Inc. for FY27 Water Main Replacements.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Carl Wilson, Charlotte Water  
Marion Sanders, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This contract will provide construction services to Charlotte Water for water main replacement  
projects at various locations across the Charlotte Water service area.  
§
§
§
On April 9, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; five bids were received.  
R.H. Price Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the first quarter of 2028.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Established MBE Goal: 6.00%  
Committed MBE Goal: 6.00%  
R.H. Price, Inc. met the established contract goal and has committed 6.00% ($174,107) of the total  
contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
Uniforce Construction Corporation (MBE, SBE) ($174,107) (pipe installation)  
Established WSBE Goal: 6.00%  
Committed WSBE Goal: 6.00%  
R.H. Price, Inc. met the established contract goal and has committed 6.00% ($174,107) of the total  
contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
Trull Contracting, LLC (WBE) ($174,107) (concrete and asphalt work)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
37. Water Treatment Chemicals  
Action:  
Approve a contract with the lowest responsive, responsible bidder Univar Solutions USA, Inc. for  
the purchase of water treatment chemicals for a term of one year.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Joseph Lockler, Charlotte Water  
Micah Burgess, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
This contract will provide water treatment chemicals for the processing of potable water.  
On April 14, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; one bid was received.  
Univar Solutions USA, Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $630,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because the scope of work or goods does not  
present viable subcontracting opportunities. Univar Solutions USA, Inc. will be responsible 100% of  
supplying and delivering the goods, and there are no opportunities to include subcontractors. This  
assessment was confirmed by CBI and the respective department after reviewing the project’s scope and  
potential for division into subcontracting opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Operating Budget  
38. Woodlawn Elevated Storage Tank Construction and  
Construction Administration Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract in the amount of $19,501,650 to the lowest responsive, responsible  
bidder Caldwell Tanks, Inc. for the Woodlawn Elevated Storage Tank Project, and  
B.  
Approve contract amendment #2 for $1,569,828 to the contract with Black & Veatch  
International Company for construction administration services for the Woodlawn Elevated  
Storage Tank Project.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
David Czerr, Charlotte Water  
Chuck Bliss, Charlotte Water  
Explanation  
§
This project is located at the intersection of South Tryon Street and Woodlawn Road in Council  
District 3.  
§
The Woodlawn Tank project is the second phase of this contract and this amendment was  
contemplated at the time of request for qualifications.  
Action A  
§
This contract will construct a 3,000,000-gallon elevated water tank and will install approximately  
1,340 linear feet of 36-inch waterline and 461 linear feet of 12-inch waterline to feed the tank.  
On March 19, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid (ITB); two bids were received.  
§
-
NC General Statute Section 143-132 prohibits municipalities from awarding construction  
contracts over $500,000 without receiving at least three competitive bids from the initial  
advertisement of the contract. The city may subsequently award the contract even if  
readvertisements result in fewer than three competitive bids.  
§
§
§
On April 22, 2026, the ITB was reissued; two bids were received.  
Caldwell Tanks, Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the first quarter of 2029.  
Action B  
§
On March 22, 2021, following a competitive solicitation process, the city entered into a contract  
with Black & Veatch International Company for $1,592,060 for design services for three elevated  
storage tanks.  
-
Amendment #1 in the amount of $1,344,848 was for construction administration services for  
the Sunset Elevated Storage Tank Project, including but not limited to inspection, materials  
testing, and blast monitoring.  
-
Amendment #2 is for construction administration services for the Woodlawn Tank Project,  
including but not limited to inspection, materials testing, and blast monitoring.  
§
The new estimated value of the contract including this amendment is $4,506,736.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Action A  
Established MWSBE Goal: 2.00%  
Committed MWSBE Goal: 2.51%  
Caldwell Tanks, Inc. exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 2.51% ($488,808) of the  
total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
§
B&N Grading (WBE) ($340,000) (asphalt and road)  
Diamond Trucking of NC Inc. (MBE, SBE) ($76,000) (hauling)  
Serene Landscape Consulting LLC (MBE, SBE) ($72,808) (landscape)  
Action B  
All additional work involved in this amendment will be performed by the Black & Veatch International  
Company and their existing subconsultants:  
§
§
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Professionals (WBE, SBE) (environmental services)  
Richa Graphics (MBE, SBE) (reprographics)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Charlotte Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
39. Faulconbridge Road Storm Drainage Improvement Project  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract in the amount of $917,855.25 to the lowest responsive, responsible  
bidder Onsite Development LLC for the Faulconbridge Road 5749 Storm Drainage  
Improvement Project, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Logan Oliver, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
This project will replace and rehabilitate aging infrastructure across and adjacent to Falstaff Drive,  
Ganymede Place, and Faulconbridge Road in Council District 5.  
§
§
§
§
The work includes grading, storm drainage, curb and gutter, and asphalt paving.  
On May 4, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; three bids were received.  
Onsite Development LLC was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the second quarter of 2027.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Established MBE Goal: 4.00%  
Committed MBE Goal: 4.03%  
Onsite Development, LLC exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 4.03% ($37,000) of  
the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
Streeter Trucking Company (MBE, SBE) ($18,500) (hauling)  
Tony’s Trucking (MBE, SBE) ($18,500) (hauling)  
Established WSBE Goal: 4.00%  
Committed WSBE Goal: 4.03%  
Onsite Development, LLC exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 4.03% ($37,000) of  
the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
Armadillo Construction LLC (SBE) (37,000) (hauling)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
40. Freedom Drive Storm Drainage Improvement Project  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract in the amount of $6,739,224.80 to the lowest responsive, responsible  
bidder Sanders Utility Construction Co. Inc. for the 3144 Freedom Drive Storm Drainage  
Improvement Project, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Logan Oliver, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
This project will replace aging infrastructure along and adjacent to Freedom Drive near its  
intersection with Tuckaseegee Road in Council District 2.  
§
§
§
§
The work includes grading, storm drainage, water, curb and gutter, sidewalk, and asphalt paving.  
On May 12, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; eight bids were received.  
Sanders Utility Construction Co. Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the second quarter of 2028.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Established MWSBE Goal: 3.00%  
Committed MWSBE Goal: 6.38%  
Sanders Utility Construction Company, Inc. exceeded the established contract goal and has committed  
6.38% ($430,000) of the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
§
§
CES Group Engineers (WBE) ($10,000) (surveying)  
Diamond Trucking of NC (MBE, SBE) ($200,000) (hauling)  
Jim Bob’s Grading & Paving (SBE) ($200,000) (asphalt)  
JM Custom Construction (WBE, SBE) ($20,000) (concrete)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
41. Professional Engineering Services for Storm Water Services  
Projects  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract for up to $1,700,000 with D&A Wolverine, PLLC for planning and design  
services for the Mullens Ford Storm Drainage Improvement Project,  
B.  
Approve a contract for up to $2,900,000 with ESP Associates, Inc. for planning and design  
services for the Long Pine Storm Drainage Improvement Project,  
C.  
Approve a contract for up to $2,500,000 with Hazen and Sawyer for planning and design  
services for the Highcroft Storm Drainage Improvement Project,  
D.  
E.  
F.  
Approve a contract for up to $2,400,000 with The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. for  
planning and design services for the Seascape Storm Drainage Improvement Project,  
Approve a contract for up to $2,800,000 with LaBella Associates, DPC for planning and  
design services for the Foxworth Storm Drainage Improvement Project,  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for which  
the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Matthew Gustis, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
§
§
These projects will replace aging storm drainage infrastructure and/or reduce flooding across the  
city.  
Professional engineering services will include evaluation of infrastructure and storm drainage  
concerns to determine and design the needed improvements to the existing drainage systems.  
Specific planning tasks include, but are not limited to:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
Site assessment activities,  
Hydrologic and hydraulic analyses,  
Determination of alternatives to address the applicable drainage issues,  
Recommendations of a preferred solution,  
Evaluation of downstream impacts, and  
Selection of project delivery method.  
§
Specific design tasks include, but are not limited to:  
-
-
-
-
-
Design of repairs and/or improvements,  
Survey and utility location services,  
Geotechnical subsurface investigations,  
Preparation of construction documents, and  
Construction administration.  
§
§
On October 2, 2025, the city issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for professional engineering  
services for storm water projects; 20 responses were received.  
The companies selected are the best qualified to meet the city’s needs on the basis of  
demonstrated competence and qualification of professional services in response to the RFQ  
requirements.  
Action A  
§
The Mullens Ford Storm Drainage Improvement Project is bordered by Simsbury Road to the north,  
Sharon View Road to the south, Carmel Road to the east, and Valencia Terrace to the west in  
Council District 6.  
Action B  
§
The Long Pine Storm Drainage Improvement Project is bordered by Trysting Road to the north,  
Kinghurst Drive to the south, McAlpine Creek to the east, and Lake Forest Road to the west in  
Council District 5.  
Action C  
§
The Highcroft Storm Drainage Improvement Project is bordered by Prosperity Ridge Road to the  
north, Katelyn Drive to the south, Stony Creek to the east, and Prosperity Church Road to the west  
in Council District 4.  
Action D  
§
The Seascape Storm Drainage Improvement Project is bordered by Sam Neely Road to the north,  
Steele Creek Road to the south and east, and Dove Meadow Drive to the west in Council District 3.  
Action E  
§
The Foxworth Storm Drainage Improvement Project is bordered by McAlpine Creek to the north, Rea  
Road to the south, Knightswood Drive to the east, and Summerlin Place to the west in Council  
District 7.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
The city negotiates project participation after the proposal selection process. Each Prime has identified the  
following certified firm(s) to be utilized:  
D&A Wolverine, PLLC  
§
Southern Engineering & Testing, PC (SBE) (geotechnical engineering, investigations, laboratory testing,  
reporting and construction administration observation)  
§
Survey & Mapping Control, Inc. (SBE) (surveying, mapping, easement plats, utility locates and related  
services)  
ESP Associates, Inc.  
§
§
Center Line Locating (WBE, SBE) (utility locating, SUE, and CCTV services)  
Habitat Assessment and Restoration Professionals (WBE, SBE) (environmental an ecological  
services)  
§
§
§
Barry Lambert Engineering, PC (SBE) (structural engineering)  
The Survey Company, Inc. (SBE) (land surveying)  
Sweetwater Utility Exploration, LLC (WBE) (utility locating, SUE)  
Hazen and Sawyer  
§
Survey & Mapping Control, Inc. (SBE) (field surveying)  
John R. McAdams Company, Inc.  
§
§
§
§
Barry Lambert Engineering, PC (SBE) (structural design support)  
Carolina Wetland Services, Inc. (WBE, SBE) (environmental permitting support)  
Froehling & Robertson, Inc. (MBE) (geotechnical engineering support)  
The Survey Company, Inc. (SBE) (field surveying)  
Labella Associates, PC  
§
§
§
§
Barry Lambert Engineering, PC (SBE) (structural engineering)  
Carolinas Geotechnical Group PLLC (SBE) (geotechnical services)  
Center Line Locating (WBE, SBE) (utility locating services)  
Survey & Mapping Control, Inc. (SBE) (land surveying and plat preparation)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Stormwater Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Maps  
42. Storm Water Repair and Improvement Projects  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract in the amount of $4,902,143.01 to the lowest responsive, responsible  
bidder Onsite Development LLC for the Storm Water Repair and Improvement FY26-I  
Projects, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Logan Oliver, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
This contract is part of an ongoing program to provide repairs and improvements to storm drainage  
infrastructure across the city.  
§
Approximately 25 projects may be constructed from this contract within a contract term not to  
exceed 24 months. The number of projects may vary depending on the nature and extent of the  
repairs constructed.  
§
§
§
On April 9, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; three bids were received.  
Onsite Development LLC was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The projects are anticipated to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2028.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Established MBE Goal: 7.00%  
Committed MBE Goal: 7.00%  
OnSite Development LLC met the established contract goal and has committed 7.00% ($343,156) of the  
total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
§
§
B Hawk and Sons Transportation Services, LLC (MBE) ($10,000) (traffic control)  
LJR Concrete, LLC (MBE, SBE) ($125,000) (concrete)  
Streeter Trucking Company (MBE, SBE) ($104,078) (hauling)  
Tony’s Trucking (MBE, SBE) ($104,078) (hauling)  
Established WSBE Goal: 5.00%  
Committed WSBE Goal: 5.00%  
OnSite Development LLC met the established contract goal and has committed 5.00% ($245,110) of the  
total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
C&M Recycling, Inc. (WBE) ($122,555) (material)  
Keys Trucking, LLC (WBE, SBE) (122,555) (hauling)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Capital Investment Plan  
43. Storm Water Services Sweeping Services  
Action:  
A.  
B.  
Approve the purchase of sweeping services from a cooperative contract,  
Approve a unit price contract with Sweeping Corporation of America, LLC for sweeping  
services for a term of four years under Sourcewell contract #111125-SWEP, and  
C.  
Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract for additional terms as long as the  
cooperative contract is in effect at prices and terms that are the same or more favorable  
than those offered under the cooperative contract.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Robbey Zink, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
This contract will provide sweeping services to identified city facilities at varying frequencies  
depending on site activities and conditions. Additional services, including but not limited to street  
sweeping, may be provided as requested by the city. Services are intended to supplement existing  
sweeping efforts, help reduce pollution and improve surface water quality, and fulfill requirements in  
the city’s municipal stormwater permit.  
§
§
NC General Statute Section 143-129(e)(3) allows local governments to purchase from formally  
organized cooperative purchasing contracts.  
A cooperative purchasing agreement results from the consolidation and competitive solicitation of  
multiple public agency requirements. By aggregating common needs all agencies are able to leverage  
economies of scale, such as volume discounts, improved terms and conditions, reduced  
administrative costs, and access to professional and technical expertise.  
§
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $250,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Operating Budget  
44. Valley Haven Stream Restoration Project  
Action:  
Approve a guaranteed maximum price of $6,000,000 to North State Environmental, Inc. (WBE) for  
Design-Build construction services for the Valley Haven Stream Restoration Project.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Matthew Gustis, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
The Valley Haven Stream Restoration Project area is located in the McAlpine Creek watershed with  
boundaries of Rocky Falls Road to the north, McAlpine Creek to the south, Pineburr Road to the  
east, and Charter Place to the west in Council District 6.  
§
§
Services consist of final design, construction, warranty, and required mitigation monitoring.  
Restoration of over 5,300 linear feet of stream is expected which will yield Stream Mitigation Units  
when complete under the city’s Umbrella Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank.  
Stream restoration projects are ideal candidates for the design-build method which allows for  
greater flexibility for field changes during construction.  
On August 22, 2022, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a contract  
for $1,193,100 with North State Environmental, Inc. for Design-Build design services for the Valley  
Haven Stream Restoration project.  
§
§
§
The city’s design-build delivery method is in conformance with NC General Statue Section 143-  
128.1(a) and consistent with the Design-Build Institute of America best practices.  
This project is pending Mecklenburg County granting a conservation easement.  
The project is anticipated to be completed by second quarter 2028.  
§
§
Charlotte Business INClusion  
The city negotiates subcontracting participation for Design-Build contracts after scopes of work are  
defined for construction services. North State Environmental, Inc., a city certified WBE will self-count its  
participation of $4,430,359 or 73.84% of the total contract for construction services.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
45. Village Lake Drive Storm Drainage Improvement Project  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract in the amount of $1,692,971.50 to the lowest responsive, responsible  
bidder GreenWater Development, Inc. for the Village Lake Drive 2210 Storm Drainage  
Improvement Project, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Angela Charles, Charlotte Water  
Mike Davis, Storm Water Services  
Logan Oliver, Storm Water Services  
Explanation  
§
This project will replace aging infrastructure along and across Village Lake Drive between its  
intersection with Pebblestone Drive and Cherry Tripp Drive in Council Districts 5 and 6.  
The work includes grading, storm drainage, water, sanitary sewer, curb and gutter, driveway,  
sidewalk, and asphalt paving.  
§
§
§
§
On April 22, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; five bids were received.  
GreenWater Development, Inc. was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
The project is anticipated to be complete by the third quarter of 2027.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Established MBE Goal: 6.00%  
Committed MBE Goal: 6.26%  
GreenWater Development, Inc. exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 6.26%  
($106,054) of the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
Redstone Materials Inc. (MBE, SBE) ($55,000) (hauling)  
RRC Concrete (MBE) ($51,054) (concrete)  
Established WSBE Goal: 5.00%  
Committed WSBE Goal: 12.55%  
GreenWater Development, Inc. exceeded the established contract goal and has committed 12.55%  
($212,500) of the total contract amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
On Time Construction (WBE, SBE) ($212,500) (masonry)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Storm Water Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
46. CATS Bus Brakes and Suspension Parts  
Action:  
A.  
Approve unit price contracts for the purchase of bus brakes and suspension parts for a term  
of three years to the following:  
Clark Power Services,  
Muncie Transit Supply, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for  
which the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Brent Cagle, CATS  
Elizabeth Presutti, CATS  
Explanation  
§
These contracts will provide numerous bus brake and suspension parts for ongoing maintenance of  
the CATS bus fleet.  
§
§
On March 25, 2026 the city issued an Invitation to Bid; seven bids were received.  
Clarke Power Services and Muncie Transit Supply were selected as the lowest responsive,  
responsible bidders.  
§
§
Bus parts will be purchased on a as-needed basis under the contract terms.  
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
§
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $650,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because there were no certified MWSBEs available  
within the city’s database capable of performing the required work or providing the necessary goods. This  
determination was made based on a comprehensive search by CBI and relevant departments, utilizing the  
city’s vendor registration system, relevant market research, and an assessment of the work required by the  
contract.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: CATS Operating Fund  
47. CATS Bus Radiator and Fuel Tank Repair Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract with the Cooling Center for bus radiators and fuel tank repair services  
for a term of three years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Brent Cagle, CATS  
Elizabeth Presutti, CATS  
Explanation  
§
This contract will provide bus radiators and fuel tank repair services on an as-needed basis for  
CATS transit vehicles.  
§
§
On March 18, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposal (RFP); one response was received.  
The Cooling Center best meets the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $345,475.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because there were no certified MWSBEs available  
within the city’s database capable of performing the required work or providing the necessary goods. This  
determination was made based on a comprehensive search by CBI and relevant departments, utilizing the  
city’s vendor registration system, relevant market research, and an assessment of the work required by the  
contract.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: CATS Operating Budget  
48. CATS Bus Transaxle Reconditioning Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a unit price contract with Carolina Powertrain for bus transaxle reconditioning  
services for a term of three years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Brent Cagle, CATS  
Elizabeth Presutti, CATS  
Explanation  
§
Carolina Powertrain will provide bus transaxle (differential) reconditioning services for CATS buses.  
This includes picking up bus transaxle units from designated CATS maintenance facilities and  
performing full diagnostic evaluation, cleaning, testing, disassembly, and rebuilding of each  
differential in accordance with original equipment manufacturer specifications and manufacturer  
standards.  
§
§
§
On April 16, 2026, the city issued an Invitation to Bid; one bid was received.  
Carolina Powertrain was selected as the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.  
Potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified increases in the  
cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the city to accept  
decreases, if warranted.  
§
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $229,112.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because there were no certified MWSBEs available  
within the city’s database capable of performing the required work or providing the necessary goods. This  
determination was made based on a comprehensive search by CBI and relevant departments, utilizing the  
city’s vendor registration system, relevant market research, and an assessment of the work required by the  
contract.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: CATS Operating Fund  
49. CATS Fare Inspector Ambassador Program  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a contract with Block by Block for a fare inspector ambassador program for a term  
of three years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to four, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Brent Cagle, CATS  
Elizabeth Presutti, CATS  
Explanation  
§
§
§
CATS is launching the fare inspection ambassador program to improve fare compliance, enhance the  
rider experience, and strengthen safety through a professional, uniformed presence on the CATS  
system. The service provider will be responsible for recruiting, training, deploying, and managing fare  
inspection ambassadors.  
Ambassadors will conduct systematic proof-of-payment inspections on trains and platforms as part  
of the initial deployment, using CATS-issued validation equipment and a standardized,  
non-confrontational inspection protocol. They will also provide basic customer assistance and  
support rider understanding of fare requirements.  
The Program will be implemented in phases beginning with the Blue Line. Subsequent phases will  
expand operations to the bus system and the Gold Line, where Ambassadors will perform the same  
duties, responsibilities, and service expectations as those required on the Blue Line.  
On April 27, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); five responses were received.  
Block by Block best meets the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $5,000,000.  
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise  
In accordance with the USDOT Interim Final Rule, dated October 3, 2025, the city cannot establish DBE goals  
on contracts executed after October 3, 2025.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: CATS Operating Budget  
50. Engineering Services for South End Station Contract  
Amendment  
Action:  
A.  
Approve contract amendment #2 for up to $1,343,222 with Kimley-Horn and Associates,  
Inc. for engineering services to support construction of a new light rail station in South End,  
and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which the  
contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Brent Cagle, CATS  
Kelly Goforth, CATS  
Todd Thorne, CATS  
Explanation  
§
This project will construct a new light rail station on the LYNX Blue Line between the New Bern and  
East/West Boulevard Stations in Council District 3.  
§
On September 13, 2021, following a competitive solicitation process, City Council approved a  
contract with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for planning and design engineering services for the  
South End Station in the amount of $1,902,864.83.  
§
§
§
§
Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) projects can consist of multiple phases including  
pre-construction, early work packages, and the construction phase.  
Contract amendment #1 was approved by Council on September 9, 2024, to add $988,723 for the  
design of additional project scope and to coordinate with the CMAR.  
Contract amendment #2 is needed to complete final design and provide engineering support services  
during construction as contemplated in the first amendment.  
The new estimated value of the contract is $4,234,811.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
All additional work involved in this amendment will be performed by Kimley-Horn and their existing  
subcontractors/subconsultants. Kimley-Horn has committed 8.55% ($362,246) of the total contract  
amount to the following certified firm(s):  
§
§
§
§
§
AVCON, Inc. (MBE) ($87,014) (electrical, water)  
Boyle (SBE) ($44,108) (geotechnical)  
CES Group Engineers (WBE) ($148,710) (survey)  
Hinde Engineering (SBE) ($39,875) (utility coordination)  
Translink (MBE) ($42,539) (public engagement)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: CATS Capital Investment Plan  
Attachment(s)  
Map  
51. Airport Technology On-Call Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve contracts for on-call technology services work for a term of five years with the  
following:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
AECOM,  
Archetype SC, Inc.,  
Athena Consulting Group,  
Cabling Solutions, Inc.,  
Faith Group, LLC,  
ITnova, LLC,  
JW Group,  
Mead & Hunt,  
Slalom,  
TAMIRONICS, and  
B.  
C.  
Authorize the City Manager to approve possible price adjustments and to amend the  
contracts consistent with the purpose for which the contracts were approved, and  
Authorize the City Manager to purchase additional software licenses, services, hardware,  
maintenance and support as required to maintain the system for as long as the city uses  
the system.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Haley Gentry, Aviation  
Mike Hill, Aviation  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
The city is responsible for overseeing and managing the technology environment for the operation of  
the Airport 24 hours a day.  
The Airport operates in a fast-changing technology environment driven by evolving security needs,  
passenger expectations, airline and tenant needs, and real-time operations.  
It is critical to ensure the Airport's technology systems are stable and safe to allow for tenants to  
connect to their own technology systems.  
These contracts include general technology services and may include the purchase and  
maintenance of software or hardware.  
§
§
On September 30, 2025, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); 13 responses were received.  
The companies selected best meet the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
Potential price adjustments may be considered as a part of contract amendments based on  
legitimate and justified increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price  
adjustments also allows the city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual aggregate expenditures are estimated to be $1,000,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
The city negotiates contract participation after the proposal selection process. MWSBE goals will be  
negotiated for each task order. Aviation will monitor MWSBE participation throughout the life of the  
contracts. Each Prime has identified the following certified firm(s) to be utilized:  
AECOM  
§
Stratic Technologies (SBE) (AI integration, real-time monitoring)  
Athena Consulting Group  
§
Lone Star Cabling & Alarms, LLC (MBE) (cabling)  
Cabling Solutions, Inc.  
§
Besco Electric Corp. (MBE) (conduit installation and electrical)  
Faith Group, LLC  
§
Exult Engineering (SBE) (communications, landside systems, security systems)  
ITnova, LLC  
§
Avioimage Mapping Services Inc. (SBE) (GIS and aerial mapping)  
§
Croixstone Consulting (WBE) (digital transformation)  
JW Group  
§
§
Avcon, Inc. (MBE) (technology and systems engineering and design and project management)  
Dawning Systems (MBE, SBE) (low Voltage, IT pm, IT systems networking and integration, IT break,  
fix, and maintenance)  
§
Trinity Strategic Consulting, Inc. (MBE) (technical consulting, project management, AI and cyber  
support)  
Mead & Hunt  
§
Slalom  
§
Deanna Michael Inc. (MBE, SBE) (planning, design, and engineering services)  
Golden Tech System Inc. (MBE) (business intelligence analysts, middleware and integrations,  
engineer)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Aviation Operating Budget  
52. E-Procurement System and Related Services  
Action:  
A.  
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Periscope Holding Inc.  
to provide, implement, and maintain an E-Procurement System for a term of five years,  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to five, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved,  
C.  
D.  
Authorize the City Manager to purchase additional software licenses, services, hardware,  
maintenance, and support as required to maintain the system for as long as the city uses  
the system, and  
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute various other contracts that support  
the E-Procurement system for services such as third-party applications, software  
implementation, change management, data conversion, hardware, and other specialized  
implementation, training, consulting, or support services.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
John Long, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
The city is implementing an E-Procurement solution for use by the entire organization to ensure  
efficiency, compliance, transparency, and equity in the procurement process. The new  
E-Procurement system will automate complex processes, offering a faster, more user-friendly  
experience for suppliers and city stakeholders.  
§
§
On July 23, 2025, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); sixteen responses were received.  
Periscope Holdings Inc. best meets the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Initial one-time expenditures are estimated to be $2,294,870, and total annual expenditures for  
years two through 10 are estimated to be $4,335,966.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
The city negotiates contract participation after the proposal selection process. Periscope Holding Inc. has  
committed 20.00% ($303,974) of the professional services portion of the contract ($1,519,870) to the  
following certified firm(s):  
§
Texcido LLC (MBE, SBE) ($303,974) (business analysis, implementation, testing)  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: I&T Operating Budget and General Capital Investment Plan  
53. Furniture, Design, and Installation Services  
Action:  
A.  
Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute contracts for furniture, design,  
installation, consulting services, and related products and services for a term of five years  
with the following:  
-
-
-
-
-
Global Furniture Group,  
Haworth, Inc.,  
MillerKnoll, Inc.,  
Steelcase,  
Teknion LLC, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contracts for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contracts consistent with the purpose for  
which the contracts were approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
John Long, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
§
§
§
These contracts will provide furniture, installation, design, consulting, and other related products  
and services for new and existing city facilities.  
Examples of furniture include office desks, chairs, bookcases, filing cabinets, conference tables and  
chairs, soft seating, and other related products.  
On February 18, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) in partnership with OMNIA  
Partners; 21 responses were received.  
OMNIA Partners is a national cooperative program which reduces costs by combining the volume and  
purchasing power of public agencies nationwide. OMNIA Partners selected the city to solicit  
proposals for these products and services.  
§
§
The companies selected best meet the city’s needs in terms of qualifications, experience, cost, and  
responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
Aggregate annual expenditures are estimated to be $6,500,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets, General Capital Investment Plan, and grant funding  
54. On-Call Fencing Installation and Repair Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve a unit price contract with Hartsell Brothers Fence Company, Inc. for on-call fencing  
installation and repair services for a term of three years, and  
B.  
Authorize the City Manager to renew the contract for up to two, one-year terms with  
possible price adjustments and to amend the contract consistent with the purpose for which  
the contract was approved.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
John Long, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
The city requires on-call fencing installation and repair services to meet security requirements and  
ensure the protection of facilities and property while also providing safety in areas with limited or  
prohibited access.  
§
These services include materials, labor, equipment, and supervision staff for fencing services to  
install, repair, and perform periodic maintenance on fences and gates on a time and material basis.  
On March 10, 2026, the city issued a Request for Proposals (RFP); two responses were received.  
Hartsell Brothers Fence Company, Inc. best meets the city’s needs in terms of qualifications,  
experience, cost, and responsiveness to RFP requirements.  
§
§
§
§
At renewal, potential price adjustments may be considered based on legitimate and justified  
increases in the cost of doing business. The ability to consider price adjustments also allows the  
city to accept decreases, if warranted.  
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $800,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Contract goals were not established for this contract because the scope of work or goods does not  
present viable subcontracting opportunities. Hartsell Brothers Fence Company, Inc. will be responsible  
100% of the work or goods, and there are no opportunities to include subcontractors. This assessment was  
confirmed by CBI and the respective department after reviewing the project’s scope and potential for  
division into subcontracting opportunities.  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets, General and Enterprise Capital Investment Plans  
55. Uniforms and Related Services  
Action:  
A.  
Approve the purchase of uniforms, equipment, and related services and technology from a  
cooperative contract,  
B.  
Approve a unit price contract with Galls, LLC for the purchase of uniforms, equipment, and  
related services and technology for a term of two years under Sourcewell Contract #011124  
-GAL, and  
C.  
Authorize the City Manager to extend the contract for additional terms as long as the  
cooperative contract is in effect at prices and terms that are the same or more favorable  
than those offered under the cooperative contact.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Cheryl Wright, Contracting and Procurement  
Explanation  
§
This contract provides access to the complete and extensive catalog of uniforms and equipment,  
including all current Police and Fire uniforms. It includes key service components such as an  
employee ordering system, reporting tools, program management, inventory control, and ongoing  
customer support. The contract also includes access to a critical local brick-and-mortar location  
that provides try-on options and tailoring services, including same-day alterations and corrections.  
NC General Statute Section 143-129(e)(3) allows local governments to purchase from formally  
organized cooperative purchasing contracts.  
A cooperative purchasing agreement results from the consolidation and competitive solicitation of  
multiple public agency requirements. By aggregating common needs all agencies are able to leverage  
economies of scale, such as volume discounts, improved terms and conditions, reduced  
administrative costs, and access to professional and technical expertise.  
§
§
§
Annual expenditures are estimated to be $5,000,000.  
Charlotte Business INClusion  
Cooperative purchasing contracts leverage contracts established by other governmental agencies and do  
not involve the city conducting a bidding process and are thus exempt from CBI Program goals.  
Subcontracting opportunities are typically not feasible under cooperative purchasing arrangements.’  
Fiscal Note  
Funding: Various Departments’ Operating Budgets  
56. Refund of Property Taxes  
Action:  
Adopt a resolution authorizing the refund of property taxes assessed through clerical or  
assessment error in the amount of $465,625.67.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Matt Hastedt, Finance  
David Browne, Finance  
Explanation  
§
Mecklenburg County notified and provided the city the list of Property Tax refund due to clerical or  
assessment error.  
Attachment(s)  
Taxpayers and Refunds Requested  
Resolution  
57. Meeting Minutes  
Action:  
Approve the titles, motions, and votes reflected in the Clerk’s record as the minutes of:  
-
-
-
-
-
April 13, 2026, Business Meeting,  
April 20, 2026, Zoning Meeting,  
April 27, 2026, Business Meeting,  
May 4, 2026, City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2027 Proposed Budget Presentation, and  
May 11, 2026, Business Meeting.  
Staff Resource(s):  
Stephanie Kelly, City Clerk’s Office  
Attachment(s)  
Meeting Minutes  
CONSENT - PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS  
58. Property Transactions - 805 Lynn Street, Parcel # 2  
Action:  
Approve the following condemnation: 805 Lynn Street, Parcel # 2  
Project: 805 Lynn Street  
Owner(s): Starnes Pallet Service Inc.  
Property Address: 1000 Thomasboro Drive  
Total Parcel Area: 383,763 sq. ft. (8.810 ac.)  
Property to be acquired by Easements: 1,334 sq. ft. (0.031 ac.) in storm drainage  
easement and 858 sq. ft. (0.020 ac.) in temporary construction easement  
Structures/Improvements to be impacted: None  
Landscaping to be impacted: None  
Zoned: N2-B and ML-2 (ANDO)  
Use: Neighborhood 2-B, Manufacturing and Logistics Airport Noise Disclosure Overlay  
Parcel Identification Number(s): 063-042-38  
Appraised Value: $8,925  
Property Owner’s Concerns: Unknown, no response received.  
City’s Response to Property Owner’s Concerns: Property owner is unresponsive however,  
outreach continues.  
Recommendation: The recommendation is to proceed to condemnation during which time  
negotiations can continue, mediation is available, and if necessary, just compensation can  
be determined by the court.  
Council District: 2  
Attachment(s): Map  
59. Property Transactions - Harrisburg Road Pedestrian Hybrid  
Beacon at Evans Wood Drive, Parcel # 3  
Action:  
Approve the following condemnation: Strategic Investment Area Harrisburg Road  
Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon at Evans Wood Drive, Parcel # 3  
Project: Harrisburg Road Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon at Evans Wood Drive  
Owner(s): Rocky River congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses  
Property Address: 8126 and 8128 Harrisburg Road  
Total Parcel Area: 237,854 sq. ft. (5.460 ac.)  
Property to be acquired by Fee Simple: 11,744 sq. ft. (0.270 ac.) inside right-of-way  
Property to be acquired by Easements: 456 sq. ft. (0.010 ac.) in sidewalk utility  
easement, 278 sq. ft. (0.006 ac.) in storm drainage easement, and 2,397 sq. ft. (0.055 ac.)  
in temporary construction easement  
Structures/Improvements to be impacted: None  
Landscaping to be impacted: Various trees and shrubs  
Zoned: N1-B  
Use: Neighborhood 1-B  
Parcel Identification Number(s): 111-131-09  
Appraised Value: $4,225  
Property Owner’s Concerns: The city is unable to reach an agreement with the property  
owner.  
City’s Response to Property Owner’s Concerns: The city continues to negotiate with the  
property owner.  
Recommendation: To avoid delay in the project schedule, the recommendation is to  
proceed to condemnation during which time negotiations can continue, mediation is  
available, and if necessary, just compensation can be determined by the court.  
Council District: 5  
Attachment(s): Map  
.
.
Adjournment  
REFERENCES  
60. Reference - Property Acquisitions and Condemnations  
§
§
The city has negotiated in good faith to acquire the properties set forth below.  
For acquisitions, the property owner and staff have agreed on a price based on appraisals and/or  
estimates.  
§
§
In the case of condemnations, the value was established by an independent, certified appraisal  
followed by a third-party appraisal review.  
Real Estate staff diligently attempts to contact all property owners by:  
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sending introductory letters via regular and certified mail,  
Making several site visits,  
Leaving door hangers and business cards,  
Seeking information from neighbors,  
Searching the internet,  
Obtaining title abstracts, and  
Leaving voice messages.  
§
§
For most condemnation cases, the city and the property owner(s) have been unable to reach a  
settlement. In some cases, condemnation is necessary to ensure a clear title to the property.  
If the City Council approves the resolutions, the City Attorney’s office will initiate condemnation  
proceedings. As part of the condemnation process, real estate staff and the City Attorney’s Office  
will continue to negotiate, including court-mandated mediation, in an attempt to resolve the matter.  
Most condemnation cases are settled by the parties prior to going to court.  
§
If a settlement cannot be reached, the case will proceed to a trial before a judge or jury to  
determine “just compensation.”  
§
§
Full text of each resolution is on file with the City Clerk’s Office.  
The definition of easement is a right created by grant, reservation, agreement, prescription, or  
necessary implication, which one has in the land of another, it is either for the benefit of land, such  
as right to cross A to get to B, or “in gross,” such as public utility easement.  
§
The term “fee simple” is a synonym for ownership and is an estate under which the owner is entitled  
to unrestricted powers to dispose of the property, and which can be left by will or inherited.  
61. Reference - Property Transaction Process  
Property Transaction Process Following City Council Approval for Condemnation  
The following overview is intended to provide further explanation for the process of property transactions  
that are approved by City Council for condemnation.  
Approximately six weeks of preparatory work is required before the condemnation lawsuit is filed. During  
this time, the City continues to negotiate with the property owner in an effort to reach a mutual  
settlement.  
§
If a settlement is reached, the condemnation process is stopped, and the property transaction  
proceeds to a real estate closing.  
§
If a settlement cannot be reached, the condemnation lawsuit is filed. Even after filing, negotiations  
continue between the property owner and the City’s legal representative. Filing of the  
condemnation documents allows:  
-
The City to gain access and title to the subject property so the capital project can proceed  
on schedule.  
-
The City to deposit the appraised value of the property in an escrow account with the Clerk  
of Court. These funds may be withdrawn by the property owner immediately upon filing, and  
at any time thereafter, with the understanding that additional funds transfer may be required  
at the time of final settlement or at the conclusion of litigation.  
§
If a condemnation lawsuit is filed, the final trial may not occur for 18 to 24 months; however, a vast  
majority of the cases settle prior to final trial. The City’s condemnation attorney remains actively  
engaged with the property owner to continue negotiations throughout litigation.  
-
North Carolina law requires that all condemnation cases go through formal non-binding  
mediation, at which an independent certified mediator attempts to facilitate a successful  
settlement. For the minority of cases that do not settle, the property owner has the right  
to a trial by judge or jury in order to determine the amount of compensation the property  
owner will receive.  
62. Reference - Charlotte Business INClusion Program  
The following excerpts from the City of Charlotte’s Charlotte Business INClusion Administrative Procedures  
Manual are intended to provide further explanation for those agenda items that reference the Charlotte  
Business INClusion Program in the business meeting agenda.  
Section 7.11 Small Business Market Strategy  
Section 7.11: The Business Inclusion Officer may develop a market strategy for SBEs that may consist of  
setting aside certain classes or sizes of contracts for targeted Solicitations to SBEs.  
Section 3.1 Contract Goals  
Section 3.1.2: Contract Goals: One or more contract goals may be established for all Contracts of  
$100,000 or more.  
Section 3.1.3: Types of Contract Goals: A Contract Goal can be a (i) MWSBE Goal, (ii) MBE Goal, (iii) SBE  
Goal, (iv) WBE Goal, (v) MSBE Goal, (vi) WSBE Goal or (vii) MWBE Goal.  
Section 3.1.4: Participation Plan for Specific City Agreements:  
3.1.4.1: Participation Plans shall be used for Contracts using the Infrastructure Reimbursements  
Agreements, Developer Agreements, Financial Partner agreements, design-build construction  
delivery method, construction manager at-risk delivery method, and public-private partnership  
construction delivery method. The Business Inclusion Officer may require a Participation Plan for  
other Contracts not specified in this section.  
3.1.4.2: The Business Inclusion Officer shall draft a Participation Plan describing what outreach and  
other efforts the Contractor will be required to undertake to meet the Contract Goals established  
for the Contract. Any revisions to a Participation Plan after submission shall be approved in writing  
by the Business Inclusion Officer.  
Section 3.1.5: Negotiated Contract Goals:  
3.1.5.1: The City may negotiate with a Business Enterprise regarding prospective MWSBE utilization on  
a Contract prior to its Solicitation. In such instances, the negotiation regarding any Contract Goals  
may involve scopes of work that are undefined prior to Solicitation but will consist of an overall City  
expenditure of funds that is known.  
Section 3.1.6: No Contract Goals: Contract Goals will not be established on a Contract if (i) there are no  
MWSBEs to perform the work for the Contract or (ii) it is an Exempt Contract.  
Section 8.0 Definitions  
Section 8.15: Contract: Any written agreement between the City and Business Enterprise, or any  
modification thereof, obligating the Business Enterprise to furnish goods or services to the City or perform  
construction activities for the City. This term shall not include exempt contracts.  
Section 8.21: Exempt Contracts: The following Contracts are exempt from all aspects of the CBI Program  
unless a Department elects otherwise:  
8.21.1 Federal Funded Agreements: Contracts that are subject to the U.S. Department of  
Transportation Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program as set forth in 49 CFR Part 26 or any  
successor legislation.  
8.21.2 Financial Partner Agreements: Contracts with a Financial Partner that has an existing MWSBE  
program or DBE program that the Financial Partner uses regularly and can provide evidence thereof.  
8.21.3 Interlocal Agreements: Contracts with other units of federal, state, or local government.  
8.21.4 Legal Services: Contracts to provide legal services on behalf of the City or its employees or  
elected officials.  
8.21.5 No Competitive Process: Contracts that are entered into without a competitive process, or  
entered into based on a competitive process administered by an entity other than the City,  
including but not limited to agreements that are entered into by sole sourcing, piggybacking, buying  
off the North Carolina State contract, buying from a competitive bidding group purchasing program  
as allowed under North Carolina General Statutes § 143-129(e)(3), or using the emergency  
procurement procedures established by the North Carolina General Statutes.  
8.21.6 Real Estate Leasing and Acquisition: Contracts for the acquisition or lease of real estate.  
8.21.7 Special Exemptions: Contracts where the Department and the Business Inclusion Officer agree  
that there was no discretion to hire an MWSBE including, but not limited to, payments or  
reimbursements to City employees or the procurement of utilities.  
8.21.8 State Funded Agreements. Contracts that are subject to an MWBE Goal set by the State of  
North Carolina pursuant to North Carolina General Statutes § 143- 128.2  
Section 5.0: Responsibilities After Contract Award  
Section 5.4: New Subcontracting Opportunities  
5.4.1: If a Contract has a previously unidentified opportunity for MWSBE participation or if a scope of  
work has been enlarged or increased, then the Contractor shall notify the Department Head.  
5.4.2 Notice: Contractor shall promptly notify the Department Head of the new opportunity for MWSBE  
participation and whether existing MWSBE Subcontractors on the Contract can and/or will perform  
the new work.  
5.4.3 Response: Upon receipt of the notice under Section 5.4.2, the Department Head shall notify the  
Contractor that (i) there will be no Supplemental Goal or (ii) there will be a Supplemental Goal based  
on MWSBE availability.  
Section 7.12: Financial Partners  
7.12.1 Exemption: If a Financial Partner currently administers a program for MWSBEs, then the Financial  
Partner may seek an exemption from the Business Inclusion Officer by communicating an intent to  
use the Financial Partner’s existing program in lieu of adhering to the CBI Program. Determinations  
are made on a case-by-case basis by Business Inclusion Officer.  
7.12.2 Contract Goals: A Financial Partner shall be subject to Section 3 (Goals) and Section 4 (Good  
Faith Efforts) if the Financial Partner has not been exempted pursuant to Section 7.11.1.